These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14313999)

  • 1. INTERACTION OF S-R COMPATIBILITY AND THE RATE OF GAIN OF INFORMATION.
    ALLUISI EA
    Percept Mot Skills; 1965 Jun; 20():815-6. PubMed ID: 14313999
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An information-processing analysis of visual imagery.
    Griffith D; Johnston WA
    J Exp Psychol; 1973 Sep; 100(1):141-6. PubMed ID: 4744489
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Invariance in the reaction time classification of same and different letter pairs.
    Blake RR; Fox R; Lappin JS
    J Exp Psychol; 1970 Jul; 85(1):133-7. PubMed ID: 5458318
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stimulus encoding as a function of modality: aural versus visual paired-associate learning.
    Berry FM; Detterman DK; Mulhern T
    J Exp Psychol; 1973 Jun; 99(1):140-2. PubMed ID: 4714076
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Contextual effects in information integration.
    Birnbaum MH; Parducci A; Gifford RK
    J Exp Psychol; 1971 May; 88(2):158-70. PubMed ID: 5577171
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Modality effects in short-term memory: storage or retrieval?
    Murdock BB
    J Exp Psychol; 1968 May; 77(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 5663602
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Elaboration and learning in childhood and adolescence.
    Rohwer WD
    Adv Child Dev Behav; 1973; 8():1-57. PubMed ID: 4592886
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. S-R COMPATIBILITY AND INFORMATION REDUCTION.
    FITTS PM; BIEDERMAN I
    J Exp Psychol; 1965 Apr; 69():408-12. PubMed ID: 14286312
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Frustration phenomena in paired-associate learning.
    Champion RA; McCann TE; Ruffels JA
    J Exp Psychol; 1972 Sep; 95(1):123-34. PubMed ID: 5070277
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Arousal, learning, and memory.
    Eysenck MW
    Psychol Bull; 1976 May; 83(3):389-404. PubMed ID: 778883
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Acquisition of verbal responses in minimal paired-associates situations by young children.
    Goss AE; Field HL; Cobb NJ; Vandament WE
    J Genet Psychol; 1967 Sep; 111(1st Half):13-27. PubMed ID: 5582302
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. S-R compatibility and the idea of a response code.
    Wallace RJ
    J Exp Psychol; 1971 Jun; 88(3):354-60. PubMed ID: 5090926
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Visual and auditory stores in short-term memory.
    Murdock BB
    Q J Exp Psychol; 1966 Aug; 18(3):206-11. PubMed ID: 5947474
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Grade interaction with words and pictures in a paired-associate task: a proposed explanation.
    Lynch S; Rohwer WD
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1972 Apr; 13(2):413-21. PubMed ID: 5028288
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. AUDITORY AND VISUAL LEARNING IN PRIMARY GRADE CHILDREN.
    BUDOFF M; QUINLAN D
    Child Dev; 1964 Jun; 35():583-6. PubMed ID: 14163562
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. SHORT-TERM STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL OF PAIRED-ASSOCIATE MATERIAL.
    MAYZNER MS; SCHOENBERG KM
    J Psychol; 1965 Jan; 59():113-23. PubMed ID: 14244129
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. LEARNING FACTORS IN THE RESPONSES OF THE RETARDED TO AMBIGUOUS STIMULI.
    SPRAGUE RL; BINDER A; SILVER R
    Am J Ment Defic; 1964 May; 68():722-33. PubMed ID: 14131317
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visual-tactile and tactile-tactile paired-associate learning by normal and poor readers.
    Steger JA; Vellutino FR; Meshoulam U
    Percept Mot Skills; 1972 Aug; 35(1):263-6. PubMed ID: 5054048
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Numerically varied S-R mapping disorder.
    Weber R; Love W; Goldstein M
    Percept Mot Skills; 1967 Oct; 25(2):361-73. PubMed ID: 6080614
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. DEMONSTRATION OF ACQUIRED DISTINCTIVENESS OF CUES USING A PAIRED-ASSOCIATE LEARNING TASK.
    SEGAL EM
    J Exp Psychol; 1964 Jun; 67():587-90. PubMed ID: 14155423
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.