These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14315138)
1. A TEST OF A DISCRIMINATION HYPOTHESIS OF SECONDARY REINFORCEMENT. MYERS NA; MYERS JL J Exp Psychol; 1965 Jul; 70():98-101. PubMed ID: 14315138 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. THE EFFECT OF RATIO OF REINFORCEMENT ON PERFORMANCE IN SELECTIVE LEARNING BY CHILDREN. DAS JP; SAHU G; PANDA TP Br J Psychol; 1965 Aug; 56():289-94. PubMed ID: 14340126 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. SELECTIVE LEARNING IN SEVERELY RETARDED CHILDREN AS A FUNCTION OF DIFFERENTIAL REACTION TO NONREWARD. SEMLER IJ Child Dev; 1965 Mar; 36():143-52. PubMed ID: 14296783 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. DELAY OF VERBAL REWARD IN VERBAL CONDITIONING AND SELECTIVE LEARNING. WEISS RF Psychol Rep; 1965 Jun; 16():857-61. PubMed ID: 14303017 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Secondary reinforcement as a function of training and testing schedules. Myers NA; Myers JL Child Dev; 1966 Sep; 37(3):645-52. PubMed ID: 5970583 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. RESPONSE FORCE AS A FUNCTION OF AMOUNT OF REINFORCEMENT. DILOLLO V; ENSMINGER WD; NOTTERMAN JM J Exp Psychol; 1965 Jul; 70():27-31. PubMed ID: 14315127 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect on retardate discrimination learning of various stimuli associated with reward. Denegre J J Exp Child Psychol; 1966 Mar; 3(1):74-82. PubMed ID: 5910571 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Predicting discrimination learning from differential conditioning with amount of reinforcement as a variable. Champion RA; Smith LR J Exp Psychol; 1966 Apr; 71(4):529-34. PubMed ID: 5909078 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. RELATION BETWEEN STIMULUS INTENSITY AND OPERANT RESPONSE RATE AS A FUNCTION OF DISCRIMINATION TRAINING AND DRIVE. GRAY JA J Exp Psychol; 1965 Jan; 69():9-24. PubMed ID: 14256256 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Percentage of reinforcement and reward magnitude effects in a T MAZE: between and within subjects. Spear NE; Pavlik WB J Exp Psychol; 1966 Apr; 71(4):521-8. PubMed ID: 5909077 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. DISCRIMINATION BASED ON SECONDARY REINFORCEMENT. FORT JG Child Dev; 1965 Jun; 36():481-90. PubMed ID: 14300867 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The relation of secondary reinforcement to delayed reward in visual discrimination learning. GRICE GR J Exp Psychol; 1948 Feb; 38(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 18910254 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. RETARDATE DISCRIMINATION LEARNING FOLLOWING DIFFERENTIAL CONDITIONING OF THE CHOICE-POINT STIMULI. EIMAS PD; SHEPP BE Child Dev; 1964 Sep; 35():685-93. PubMed ID: 14203804 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. MULTIDIMENSIONAL STIMULUS DIFFERENCES IN DISCRIMINATION LEARNING AND VERBALIZATION OF THE REINFORCEMENT CONTINGENCY. MARTIN RB; DEAN SJ Psychol Rep; 1965 Feb; 16():235-40. PubMed ID: 14283969 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Conditions affecting acquisition of observing responses in the absence of differential reward. Mitchell KM; Perkins NP; Perkins CC J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1965 Dec; 60(3):435-7. PubMed ID: 5839270 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. SECONDARY REINFORCEMENT IN CHILDREN AS A FUNCTION OF CONDITIONING ASSOCIATIONS AND EXTINCTION PERCENTAGES. MYERS JL; MYERS NA J Exp Psychol; 1964 Dec; 68():611-2. PubMed ID: 14241096 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Response-chain learning of mentally retarded adolescents under four conditions of reinforcement. Talkington LW Am J Ment Defic; 1971 Nov; 76(3):337-40. PubMed ID: 5148363 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. A neural model of attention, reinforcement and discrimination learning. Grossberg S Int Rev Neurobiol; 1975; 18():263-327. PubMed ID: 1107246 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]