These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14316993)

  • 1. DIRECT AND VICARIOUS EFFECTS OF A SHIFT IN MAGNITUDE OF REWARD ON PERFORMANCE.
    BRUNING JL
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1965 Aug; 2():278-82. PubMed ID: 14316993
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. EFFECTS OF MAGNITUDE OF REWARD AND PERCENTAGE OF REINFORCEMENT ON A LEVER MOVEMENT RESPONSE.
    BRUNING JL
    Child Dev; 1964 Mar; 35():281-5. PubMed ID: 14128815
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. SELECTIVE LEARNING IN SEVERELY RETARDED CHILDREN AS A FUNCTION OF DIFFERENTIAL REACTION TO NONREWARD.
    SEMLER IJ
    Child Dev; 1965 Mar; 36():143-52. PubMed ID: 14296783
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. EFFECTS OF REINFORCEMENT VALUE ON EXPECTANCY STATEMENTS IN SKILL AND CHANCE SITUATIONS.
    PHARES EJ
    Percept Mot Skills; 1965 Jun; 20():845-52. PubMed ID: 14314006
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. INCENTIVE MAGNITUDE, TASK ORIENTATION, AND PERSISTENCE.
    NAKAMURA CY; LOWENKRON BZ
    Child Dev; 1964 Sep; 35():611-21. PubMed ID: 14203796
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effects of verbal reinforcement on children's performance as a function of type of task.
    Allen S
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1966 Mar; 3(1):57-73. PubMed ID: 5910570
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of the effects of positive and negative vicarious reinforcement in an operant learning task.
    Kelly R
    J Educ Psychol; 1966 Oct; 57(5):307-10. PubMed ID: 5918300
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Money and praise: do they improve motor learning and performance?
    Martens R; Burwitz L; Newell KM
    Res Q; 1972 Dec; 43(4):429-42. PubMed ID: 4510620
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of reward magnitude, percentage of reinforcement, and training method on acquisition and reversal in a T maze.
    HILL WF; COTTON JW; CLAYTON KN
    J Exp Psychol; 1962 Jul; 64():81-6. PubMed ID: 13907385
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Role of value of reward and model affective response in vicarious reinforcement.
    Lerner L; Weiss RL
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1972 Jan; 21(1):93-100. PubMed ID: 5058256
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of correlated amount of reward on performance on a fixed-interval schedule of reinforcement.
    HENDRY DP
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1962 Jun; 55():387-91. PubMed ID: 13906436
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. EFFECT OF EFFORT ON VALUE: AN EXPLORATORY STUDY OF CHILDREN.
    LEWIS M
    Child Dev; 1964 Dec; 35():1337-42. PubMed ID: 14251378
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Social reinforcement and knowledge of results as determinants of motor performance among EMR childern.
    Levy J
    Am J Ment Defic; 1974 May; 78(6):752-8. PubMed ID: 4838153
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Analysis of WISC coding. 3. Writing and copying speed, and motivation.
    Lyle JG; Johnson EG
    Percept Mot Skills; 1973 Feb; 36(1):211-4. PubMed ID: 4686712
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Role of reward magnitude and incomplete reduction of reward magnitude in the frustration effect.
    McHose JH; Ludvigson HW
    J Exp Psychol; 1965 Nov; 70(5):490-5. PubMed ID: 5833670
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Selective reinforcement of response speeds in children.
    Cairns RB; Proctor S
    J Exp Psychol; 1968 May; 77(1):168-70. PubMed ID: 5663592
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Realignment of discrepant reinforcement value.
    Weick KE; Prestholdt P
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1968 Feb; 8(2):180-7. PubMed ID: 5644479
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. NEED APPROVAL AND MOTOR STEADINESS UNDER POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE APPROVAL CONDITIONS.
    STRICKLAND BR
    Percept Mot Skills; 1965 Apr; 20():667-8. PubMed ID: 14279360
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Differential effects of motivational orientations and incentive conditions on motor performance in institutionalized retardates.
    Haywood HC; Weaver SJ
    Am J Ment Defic; 1967 Nov; 72(3):459-67. PubMed ID: 6077016
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hemispheric dissociation of reward processing in humans: insights from deep brain stimulation.
    Palminteri S; Serra G; Buot A; Schmidt L; Welter ML; Pessiglione M
    Cortex; 2013; 49(10):2834-44. PubMed ID: 23643244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.