These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1431758)

  • 1. Semantic congruity effects and theories of the comparison process.
    Petrusic WM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1992 Nov; 18(4):962-86. PubMed ID: 1431758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Remembered instructions with symbolic and perceptual comparisons.
    Petrusic WM; Shaki S; Leth-Steensen C
    Percept Psychophys; 2008 Feb; 70(2):179-89. PubMed ID: 18372741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Semantic congruity effects in perceptual comparisons.
    Petrusic WM; Baranski JV
    Percept Psychophys; 1989 May; 45(5):439-52. PubMed ID: 2726407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The locus and nature of semantic congruity in symbolic comparison: evidence from the Stroop effect.
    Shaki S; Algom D
    Mem Cognit; 2002 Jan; 30(1):3-17. PubMed ID: 11958352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Metacognition in psychophysical judgment: an unfolding view of comparative judgments of mental workload.
    Petrusic WM; Cloutier P
    Percept Psychophys; 1992 May; 51(5):485-99. PubMed ID: 1594438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Priming effects in perceptual classification.
    Flowers JH
    Percept Psychophys; 1990 Feb; 47(2):135-48. PubMed ID: 2304812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of instruction presentation mode in comparative judgments.
    Shaki S; Leth-Steensen C; Petrusic WM
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Jan; 34(1):196-206. PubMed ID: 16686118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Semantic processing of crowded stimuli?
    Huckauf A; Knops A; Nuerk HC; Willmes K
    Psychol Res; 2008 Nov; 72(6):648-56. PubMed ID: 18841386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Congruity and the perceptual comparison task.
    Marschark M; Paivio A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1981 Apr; 7(2):290-308. PubMed ID: 6453924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Semantic congruity and expectancy in symbolic judgments.
    Banks WP; White H; Sturgill W; Mermelstein R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1983 Aug; 9(4):560-82. PubMed ID: 6224893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Color congruity effect: where do colors and numbers interact in synesthesia?
    Cohen Kadosh R; Henik A
    Cortex; 2006 Feb; 42(2):259-63. PubMed ID: 16683500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. What's in an object file? Evidence from priming studies.
    Gordon RD; Irwin DE
    Percept Psychophys; 1996 Nov; 58(8):1260-77. PubMed ID: 8961836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Size congruity effects with two-digit numbers: expanding the number line?
    Fitousi D; Algom D
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Mar; 34(2):445-57. PubMed ID: 16752607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A further test of sequential-sampling models that account for payoff effects on response bias in perceptual decision tasks.
    Diederich A
    Percept Psychophys; 2008 Feb; 70(2):229-56. PubMed ID: 18372746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Attention to local form information can prevent access to semantic information.
    Murray JE; Jones C
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2002 Apr; 55(2):609-25. PubMed ID: 12047062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The role of parity, physical size, and magnitude in numerical cognition: the SNARC effect revisited.
    Fitousi D; Shaki S; Algom D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Jan; 71(1):143-55. PubMed ID: 19304604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Direct and indirect effects of action on object classification.
    Yoon EY; Humphreys GW
    Mem Cognit; 2005 Oct; 33(7):1131-46. PubMed ID: 16532849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A model of response time effects in symbolic comparison.
    Leth-Steensen C; Marley AA
    Psychol Rev; 2000 Jan; 107(1):62-100. PubMed ID: 10687403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Automatic comparisons of artificial digits never compared: learning linear ordering relations.
    Tzelgov J; Yehene V; Kotler L; Alon A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2000 Jan; 26(1):103-20. PubMed ID: 10682292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Lack of set size effects in spatial updating: Evidence for offline updating.
    Hodgson E; Waller D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jul; 32(4):854-66. PubMed ID: 16822153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.