These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14317732)

  • 1. EXPOSING THE GINGIVAL MARGIN BY TAKING IMPRESSIONS WITH ELASTIC MATERIAL--SOME CLINICAL AND HISTOPATHOLOGICAL ASPECTS.
    ANNEROTH G; GOERANSSON P
    Odontol Tidskr; 1965 Jun; 73():394-409. PubMed ID: 14317732
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Clinical evaluation of two types of fixed partial denture impressions].
    Shi LS; Wang LK; Zhang XJ
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Oct; 25(5):485-6. PubMed ID: 18072566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Gingival retraction methods. A literature review].
    Tosches NA; Salvi GE
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 2009; 119(2):121-38. PubMed ID: 19306598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Gingival tissue retraction for the elastic impression materials.
    Bull AW; Brinsden GI
    Aust Dent J; 1967 Aug; 12(4):310-3. PubMed ID: 4860964
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Accurate fit technic for gingiva masking with special impression material].
    Rabstein M
    Dent Labor (Munch); 1982 Jan; 30(1):48. PubMed ID: 7049745
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of one-step vs. two-step impression techniques on long-term accuracy and dimensional stability when the finish line is within the gingival sulcular area.
    Levartovsky S; Zalis M; Pilo R; Harel N; Ganor Y; Brosh T
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Feb; 23(2):124-33. PubMed ID: 23734561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reaction of the gingiva to the application of threads in the gingival pocket for taking impressions with elastic material. An experimental histological study.
    Anneroth G; Nordenram A
    Odontol Revy; 1969; 20(3):301-10. PubMed ID: 4903190
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Influence of the type of impression material, impression tray and making impression technology on the dimensional accuracy and depth of impression material penetration into "gingival sulcus". In vitro study].
    Riakhovskiĭ AN; Muradov MA
    Stomatologiia (Mosk); 2005; 84(4):57-64. PubMed ID: 16091710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of the width of gingival pocket exposure and saliva on the accuracy of silicone and agar-agar impressions.
    Posti JJ
    Proc Finn Dent Soc; 1973 Apr; 69(2):63-70. PubMed ID: 4586572
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Have fixed-prosthodontic impressions become easier?
    Christensen GJ
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2003 Aug; 134(8):1121-3. PubMed ID: 12956356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Gingival retraction using Gingifoam. Inflation exposes the margin].
    Martignoni M; Feinman P
    Attual Dent; 1985 Nov; 1(30):13-7. PubMed ID: 3914901
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Gingival sulcus simulation model for evaluating the penetration characteristics of elastomeric impression materials.
    Aimjirakul P; Masuda T; Takahashi H; Miura H
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(4):385-9. PubMed ID: 12956493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Impressions techniques--Part 2].
    Levartovsky S; Masri M; Alter E; Pilo R
    Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993); 2012 Oct; 29(4):33-8, 71. PubMed ID: 23367724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Gingival displacement for impression making in fixed prosthodontics: contemporary principles, materials, and techniques.
    Baba NZ; Goodacre CJ; Jekki R; Won J
    Dent Clin North Am; 2014 Jan; 58(1):45-68. PubMed ID: 24286645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Final impressions: a review of material properties and description of a current technique.
    Perakis N; Belser UC; Magne P
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2004 Apr; 24(2):109-17. PubMed ID: 15119881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Retraction of the gingival margin for impressions with plastic materials].
    Rossi G
    Rev Asoc Odontol Argent; 1990; 78(2):98-102. PubMed ID: 2099492
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Setting Time of Polyether Impression Materials after Contact with Conventional and Experimental Gingival Margin Displacement Agents.
    Nowakowska D; Raszewski Z; Ziętek M; Saczko J; Kulbacka J; Więckiewicz W
    J Prosthodont; 2018 Feb; 27(2):182-188. PubMed ID: 27333590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. GINGIVAL RETRACTION FOR CROWN IMPRESSIONS.
    HOLMES HM
    Dent Dig; 1965 Aug; 71():360-3. PubMed ID: 14323066
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reliable retraction technique for elastic impression materials.
    Schechtman S
    Dent Dig; 1970 May; 76(5):225-7. PubMed ID: 4909370
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Preservation of the negative image of tooth enamel with dental impression material enhances morphometric measurements of gingival overgrowth.
    Miller ML; Andringa A; Turner LT; Dalton TP; Derkenne S; Nebert DW
    Microsc Res Tech; 2003 Apr; 60(5):528-36. PubMed ID: 12619128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.