149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1432006)
1. Meta-analysis adjusting for compliance: the example of screening for breast cancer.
Glasziou PP
J Clin Epidemiol; 1992 Nov; 45(11):1251-6. PubMed ID: 1432006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Increased benefit from shorter screening mammography intervals for women ages 40-49 years.
Feig SA
Cancer; 1997 Dec; 80(11):2035-9. PubMed ID: 9392324
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The Canadian National Breast Screening Study-1: breast cancer mortality after 11 to 16 years of follow-up. A randomized screening trial of mammography in women age 40 to 49 years.
Miller AB; To T; Baines CJ; Wall C
Ann Intern Med; 2002 Sep; 137(5 Part 1):305-12. PubMed ID: 12204013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mammography: reviewing the evidence. Epidemiology aspect.
Miller AB
Can Fam Physician; 1993 Jan; 39():85-90. PubMed ID: 8435565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Summaries for patients. Mammograms in women age 40 to 49: results of the Canadian Breast Cancer Screening study.
Ann Intern Med; 2002 Sep; 137(5 Part 1):I28. PubMed ID: 12204045
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Canadian National Breast Screening Study: 2. Breast cancer detection and death rates among women aged 50 to 59 years.
Miller AB; Baines CJ; To T; Wall C
CMAJ; 1992 Nov; 147(10):1477-88. PubMed ID: 1423088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Canadian National Breast Screening Study: 1. Breast cancer detection and death rates among women aged 40 to 49 years.
Miller AB; Baines CJ; To T; Wall C
CMAJ; 1992 Nov; 147(10):1459-76. PubMed ID: 1423087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Promoting regular mammography screening II. Results from a randomized controlled trial in US women veterans.
Vernon SW; del Junco DJ; Tiro JA; Coan SP; Perz CA; Bastian LA; Rakowski W; Chan W; Lairson DR; McQueen A; Fernandez ME; Warrick C; Halder A; DiClemente C
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 Mar; 100(5):347-58. PubMed ID: 18314474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Frequency and predictive value of a mammographic recommendation for short-interval follow-up.
Yasmeen S; Romano PS; Pettinger M; Chlebowski RT; Robbins JA; Lane DS; Hendrix SL
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2003 Mar; 95(6):429-36. PubMed ID: 12644536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Breast cancer screening: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.
Humphrey LL; Helfand M; Chan BK; Woolf SH
Ann Intern Med; 2002 Sep; 137(5 Part 1):347-60. PubMed ID: 12204020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Meta-analysis of breast cancer mortality benefit and overdiagnosis adjusted for adherence: improving information on the effects of attending screening mammography.
Jacklyn G; Glasziou P; Macaskill P; Barratt A
Br J Cancer; 2016 May; 114(11):1269-76. PubMed ID: 27124337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Compliance with screening mammography and breast sonography of young Asian women.
Tsai HW; Twu NF; Ko CC; Yen MS; Yang MJ; Chao KC; Wen L; Chen CY; Chou YH; Chen YJ
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Jul; 157(1):89-93. PubMed ID: 21439713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mammographic screening of women aged 40 to 49 years. Is it justified?
Feig SA
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 1994 Dec; 21(4):587-606. PubMed ID: 7731636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A different view on what is known about breast screening and the Canadian National Breast Screening Study.
Baines CJ
Cancer; 1994 Aug; 74(4):1207-11. PubMed ID: 8055439
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Efficacy of screening mammography. A meta-analysis.
Kerlikowske K; Grady D; Rubin SM; Sandrock C; Ernster VL
JAMA; 1995 Jan; 273(2):149-54. PubMed ID: 7799496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Benefit of screening mammography in women aged 40-49: a new meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Hendrick RE; Smith RA; Rutledge JH; Smart CR
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1997; (22):87-92. PubMed ID: 9709282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Mammographic surveillance of breast cancer patient relatives; implementation of guidelines formulated by the Netherlands College of General Practitioners].
Duijm LE; Zaat JO; Guit GL
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1998 Apr; 142(14):778-81. PubMed ID: 9646610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mammographic screening trials for women aged under 50. A quality assessment and meta-analysis.
Glasziou PP; Woodward AJ; Mahon CM
Med J Aust; 1995 Jun; 162(12):625-9. PubMed ID: 7603372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Canadian National Breast Screening Study: a perspective on criticisms.
Baines CJ
Ann Intern Med; 1994 Feb; 120(4):326-34. PubMed ID: 8291826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical breast examination: preliminary results from a cluster randomized controlled trial in India.
Sankaranarayanan R; Ramadas K; Thara S; Muwonge R; Prabhakar J; Augustine P; Venugopal M; Anju G; Mathew BS
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2011 Oct; 103(19):1476-80. PubMed ID: 21862730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
