These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1432013)

  • 1. Modelling result-specific likelihood ratios.
    Irwig L
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1992 Nov; 45(11):1335-8. PubMed ID: 1432013
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Use of statistics and scientific inference: odds ratios, likelihood ratio, and receiving operating characteristic curves.
    Hoesley C; Centor RM; Heudebert GR
    J Infect Dis; 1998 Sep; 178(3):921-3. PubMed ID: 9728576
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using the likelihood ratio.
    Okada T; Rao G
    J Fam Pract; 2005 Feb; 54(2):127-8. PubMed ID: 15689286
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Predictors of coroner's verdict: a logistic regression model.
    Salib E
    Med Sci Law; 1996 Jul; 36(3):237-41. PubMed ID: 8918092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The genetic sonogram: comparing the use of likelihood ratios versus logistic regression coefficients for Down syndrome screening.
    Zhong Y; Longman R; Bradshaw R; Odibo AO
    J Ultrasound Med; 2011 Apr; 30(4):463-9. PubMed ID: 21460145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical utility of likelihood ratios.
    Gallagher EJ
    Ann Emerg Med; 1998 Mar; 31(3):391-7. PubMed ID: 9506499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. To handle the inflation of odds ratios in a retrospective study with a profile penalized log-likelihood approach.
    Tzeng IS
    J Clin Lab Anal; 2021 Jul; 35(7):e23849. PubMed ID: 34043251
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The misuse of predictive value--or why you must consider the odds.
    Gambino R
    Ann Ist Super Sanita; 1991; 27(3):395-9. PubMed ID: 1809058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improved interaction models of temporomandibular joint anatomic relationships in asymptomatic subjects and patients with disc displacement with or without reduction.
    Seligman DA; Pullinger AG
    J Orofac Pain; 2004; 18(3):192-202. PubMed ID: 15508998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Likelihood ratios, sensitivity, and specificity values can be back-calculated when the odds ratios are known.
    Simel DL; Easter J; Tomlinson G
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Apr; 66(4):458-60. PubMed ID: 23021858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Refining clinical diagnosis with likelihood ratios.
    Grimes DA; Schulz KF
    Lancet; 2005 Apr 23-29; 365(9469):1500-5. PubMed ID: 15850636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Computed tomographic angiography for detecting cerebral aneurysms: implications of aneurysm size distribution for the sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios.
    van Gelder JM
    Neurosurgery; 2003 Sep; 53(3):597-605; discussion 605-6. PubMed ID: 12943576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of adjustment for referral bias on the sensitivity and specificity of single photon emission computed tomography for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease.
    Miller TD; Hodge DO; Christian TF; Milavetz JJ; Bailey KR; Gibbons RJ
    Am J Med; 2002 Mar; 112(4):290-7. PubMed ID: 11893368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biostatistics in clinical decision making for cardiothoracic radiologists.
    Zurakowski D; Johnson VM; Lee EY
    J Thorac Imaging; 2013 Nov; 28(6):368-75. PubMed ID: 23358369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The use of likelihood ratios and odds ratios by Sawhney et al.
    Bansal C; Schwartz MD
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2007 Oct; 102(10):2350; author reply 2350. PubMed ID: 17897345
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Advantages to transforming the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve into likelihood ratio co-ordinates.
    Fosgate GT
    Stat Med; 2005 Apr; 24(8):1287-8; author reply 1288. PubMed ID: 15765500
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A new logistic regression approach for the evaluation of diagnostic test results.
    Janssens AC; Deng Y; Borsboom GJ; Eijkemans MJ; Habbema JD; Steyerberg EW
    Med Decis Making; 2005; 25(2):168-77. PubMed ID: 15800301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of the likelihood ratios of two binary diagnostic tests in paired designs.
    Nofuentes JA; Del Castillo Jde D
    Stat Med; 2007 Sep; 26(22):4179-201. PubMed ID: 17357992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Generalized Mantel-Haenszel procedures for 2 x J tables.
    Yanagawa T; Fujii Y; Mastuoka J
    Environ Health Perspect; 1994 Nov; 102 Suppl 8(Suppl 8):57-60. PubMed ID: 7851333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparative investigation of methods for logistic regression with separated or nearly separated data.
    Heinze G
    Stat Med; 2006 Dec; 25(24):4216-26. PubMed ID: 16955543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.