These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14325860)

  • 1. STIMULUS CODING IN THE COCHLEAR NUCLEUS.
    KIANG NY; PFEIFFER RR; WARR WB; BACKUS AS
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1965 Jun; 74():463-85. PubMed ID: 14325860
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL EXAMINATION OF COCHLEAR NUCLEUS IN CAT.
    ALTMAN YA; RADIONOVA EA; RATNIKOVA GI
    Fed Proc Transl Suppl; 1964; 23():1201-5. PubMed ID: 14209840
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [CENTRIFUGAL INHIBITION OF SINGLE AFFERENT NEURONS OF THE COCHLEAR NUCLEUS BY SOUND (CATS)].
    PFALZ R; DUNKER E; GRUBEL G
    Arch Ohren Nasen Kehlkopfheilkd; 1963 Dec; 182():642-6. PubMed ID: 14117020
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [ALTERATION OF SPONTANEOUSLY ACTIVE, DEAFFERENTATED SINGLE NEURONS OF THE COCHLEAR NUCLEUS IN CATS BY TONE STIMULATION OF THE OPPOSITE SIDE].
    DUNKER E; GRUBEL G; PFALZ R
    Pflugers Arch Gesamte Physiol Menschen Tiere; 1964 Jan; 278():610-23. PubMed ID: 14138718
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [ON THE MECHANISM OF THE FUNCTION OF THE EFFERENT AUDITORY SYSTEM. I. INHIBITION OF DEAFFERENTIATED SECONDARY COCHLEAR NEURONS BY SOUND STIMULATION OF THE OOPOSITE EAR AFTER SECTION OF DESCENDING AND DORSALLY CROSSING TRACTS (CATS)].
    GRUBEL G; DUNKER E; VON REHREN
    Pflugers Arch Gesamte Physiol Menschen Tiere; 1964 Oct; 281():109-21. PubMed ID: 14327853
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [ON THE MECHANISM OF THE FUNCTION OF THE EFFERENT AUDITORY SYSTEM. I. INHIBITION OF DEAFFERENTIATED SECONDARY COCHLEAR NEURONS BY SOUND STIMULATION OF THE OPPOSITE EAR AFTER SECTION OF DESCENDING AND DORSALLY CROSSING TRACTS (CATS)].
    GRUBEL G; DUNKER E; VON REHREN
    Pflugers Arch Gesamte Physiol Menschen Tiere; 1964 Oct; 281():109-21. PubMed ID: 14330872
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Demonstration of acoustic efferent nerves and their effect on the noise-absorbing periphery (cochlear nucleus; cochlea)].
    PFALZ R
    Arch Ohren Nasen Kehlkopfheilkd; 1962; 180():730-2. PubMed ID: 13943049
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Neural correlates of acoustic signals.
    Lynn PA
    Proc R Soc Med; 1968 Apr; 61(4):354. PubMed ID: 5653991
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. SPECIAL TESTS IN THE EARLY DIAGNOSIS OF ACOUSTIC NEUROMAS.
    PULEC JL; HOUSE WF
    Trans Am Laryngol Rhinol Otol Soc; 1964; ():323-33. PubMed ID: 14270849
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of the efferent effects of the homolateral and contralateral olivo-cochlear bundles.
    Sohmer H
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1966 Jul; 62(1):74-87. PubMed ID: 5967877
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Stimulus coding in the cat's auditory nerve. Preliminary report.
    KIANG NY; WATANABE T; THOMAS EC; CLARK LF
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1962 Dec; 71():1009-26. PubMed ID: 14032447
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Cochlear potentials after transection of the 8th nerve in cats].
    FISCH U
    Pract Otorhinolaryngol (Basel); 1962; 24():178-84. PubMed ID: 13893093
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Stimulation model of single neural elements of the cochlear nucleus of the waking cat after bilateral acoustic stimulation with sinus tones].
    von Westernhagen B; Oehlschlägel HK; Blank M
    Arch Klin Exp Ohren Nasen Kehlkopfheilkd; 1968; 191(2):572-7. PubMed ID: 5716740
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stimulus coding in the cochlear nucleus.
    Kiang NY; Pfeiffer RR; Warr WB; Backus AS
    Trans Am Otol Soc; 1965; 53():35-58. PubMed ID: 5834666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. COCHLEAR POTENTIALS AND 8 NERVE ACTION POTENTIALS IN NORMAL AND GENETICALLY DEAF MICE.
    MIKAELIAN D; ALFORD BR; RUBEN RJ
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1965 Mar; 74():146-57. PubMed ID: 14265617
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Response plasticity in cochlear nucleus of decerebrate cats during acoustic habituation procedures.
    Buchwald JS; Humphrey GL
    J Neurophysiol; 1972 Nov; 35(6):864-78. PubMed ID: 4654253
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. THE EFFERENT INNERVATION OF THE INNER EAR. A HISTORICAL-BIBLIOGRAPHICAL SURVEY.
    ROSSI G; CORTESINA G
    Laryngoscope; 1965 Feb; 75():212-35. PubMed ID: 14270671
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of electrical and acoustical stimulation of the cat ear.
    Simmons FB; Glattke TJ
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1972 Oct; 81(5):731-7. PubMed ID: 4651115
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [INFLUENCE OF THE DURATION AND INTENSITY OF SOUND STIMULATION ON THE ELECTRIC POTENTIALS OF THE EAR].
    BURGEAT M
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1964; 18():532-8. PubMed ID: 14222143
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. AUDITORY HABITUATION IN CATS AS A FUNCTION OF STIMULUS INTENSITY.
    DUNLOP CW; MCLACHLAN EM; WEBSTER WR; DAY RH
    Nature; 1964 Aug; 203():874-5. PubMed ID: 14204079
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.