These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1432796)

  • 21. Effect of different retraction and impression techniques on the marginal fit of crowns.
    Wöstmann B; Rehmann P; Trost D; Balkenhol M
    J Dent; 2008 Jul; 36(7):508-12. PubMed ID: 18479801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A systematic review of cardiovascular effects of epinephrine on hypertensive dental patients.
    Bader JD; Bonito AJ; Shugars DA
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2002 Jun; 93(6):647-53. PubMed ID: 12142870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effects of diameter, chemical impregnation and hydration on the tensile strength of gingival retraction cords.
    Del Rocío Nieto-Martínez M; Maupomé G; Barceló-Santana F
    J Oral Rehabil; 2001 Dec; 28(12):1094-100. PubMed ID: 11874507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effects of gingival retraction materials on gingival blood flow.
    Polat NT; Ozdemir AK; Turgut M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 17319365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Three-dimensional model analysis of the gingival sulcus width from different retraction time].
    Zhang Jj; Liu Yh; Lv Pj; Zhao Yj
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2011 Feb; 43(1):73-6. PubMed ID: 21321624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A Clinical Study of 50 Partially Edentulous Patients with Fixed Partial Denture Restorations to Compare Clinical Parameters and Changes in Gingival Sulcus Width After Displacement with 2 Different Gingival Retraction Cord Materials (Cotton and Polymer).
    Kumar L; Mattoo KA; Jain S; Khalid I; Kota MZ; Baig FAH; Ibrahim M; Javali MA; Khader MA; Kanji MA
    Med Sci Monit; 2023 Apr; 29():e940098. PubMed ID: 37183802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Reaction of the gingiva to the application of threads in the gingival pocket for taking impressions with elastic material. An experimental histological study.
    Anneroth G; Nordenram A
    Odontol Revy; 1969; 20(3):301-10. PubMed ID: 4903190
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evaluation of new gingival retraction agents.
    Bowles WH; Tardy SJ; Vahadi A
    J Dent Res; 1991 Nov; 70(11):1447-9. PubMed ID: 1960257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Using the double-cord packing technique of tissue retraction for making crown impressions.
    Cloyd S; Puri S
    Dent Today; 1999 Jan; 18(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 10765795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Current methods of finish-line exposure by practicing prosthodontists.
    Hansen PA; Tira DE; Barlow J
    J Prosthodont; 1999 Sep; 8(3):163-70. PubMed ID: 10740498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Determination of plasma catecholamines in dogs after experimental gingival retraction with epinephrine-impregnated cord.
    Shaw DH; Krejci RF; Todd GL; Reinhardt RA
    Arch Oral Biol; 1987; 32(3):217-9. PubMed ID: 3310978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A clinical study on the effects of cordless and conventional retraction techniques on the gingival and periodontal health.
    Al Hamad KQ; Azar WZ; Alwaeli HA; Said KN
    J Clin Periodontol; 2008 Dec; 35(12):1053-8. PubMed ID: 19040582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. To cord or not to cord? That is still a question.
    Veitz-Keenan A; Keenan JR
    Evid Based Dent; 2017 Mar; 18(1):21-22. PubMed ID: 28338036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Clinical effectiveness of mechanical-chemical tissue displacement methods.
    Weir DJ; Williams BH
    J Prosthet Dent; 1984 Mar; 51(3):326-9. PubMed ID: 6368802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A multicenter randomized, controlled clinical trial comparing the use of displacement cords, an aluminum chloride paste, and a combination of paste and cords for tissue displacement.
    Einarsdottir ER; Lang NP; Aspelund T; Pjetursson BE
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jan; 119(1):82-88. PubMed ID: 28478985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of Gingival Retraction Materials Using a New Gingival Sulcus Model.
    Dederichs M; Fahmy MD; Kuepper H; Guentsch A
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Aug; 28(7):784-789. PubMed ID: 31206914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Gingival retraction.
    Harris R
    Aust Dent J; 1978 Aug; 23(4):359-60. PubMed ID: 367342
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Laboratory evaluation of retraction cords properties].
    Muradov MA; Ryakhovsky AN; Poyurovskaya IY; Ilyasov RN
    Stomatologiia (Mosk); 2016; 95(2):54-57. PubMed ID: 27239998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Fluid absorbency of retraction cords after soaking in aluminum chloride solution.
    Runyan DA; Reddy TG; Shimoda LM
    J Prosthet Dent; 1988 Dec; 60(6):676-8. PubMed ID: 3060598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Alum solution as an adjunct to gingival retraction. A clinical evaluation.
    Wilson CA; Tay WM
    Br Dent J; 1977 Mar; 142(5):155-8. PubMed ID: 320987
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.