568 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1433765)
1. Induced termination of pregnancy before and after Roe v Wade. Trends in the mortality and morbidity of women. Council on Scientific Affairs, American Medical Association.
JAMA; 1992 Dec; 268(22):3231-9. PubMed ID: 1433765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fetal viability as a threshold to personhood. A legal analysis.
Peterfy A
J Leg Med; 1995 Dec; 16(4):607-36. PubMed ID: 8568420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The evolution of a constitutional right to an abortion. Fashioned in the 1970s and secured in the 1980s.
Ford N
J Leg Med; 1983 Sep; 4(3):271-322. PubMed ID: 6355342
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Roe v. Wade reaffirmed, again.
Annas GJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1986 Oct; 16(5):26-7. PubMed ID: 3771197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mortality from abortion after Roe vs Wade.
Smargisso DM; Lester D
Psychol Rep; 2002 Dec; 91(3 Pt 1):780. PubMed ID: 12530723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. State legislation on abortion after Roe v. Wade: selected constitutional issues.
Bryant MD
Am J Law Med; 1976; 2(1):101-32. PubMed ID: 973625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Planned Parenthood v Casey.
Lasky HP
JAMA; 1993 Dec; 270(21):2559; author reply 2559-60. PubMed ID: 8230640
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The evolution of the right to privacy after Roe v. Wade.
Barnard D
Am J Law Med; 1987; 13(2 3):365-525. PubMed ID: 11659051
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Limiting state regulation of reproductive decisions.
Glantz LH
Am J Public Health; 1984 Feb; 74(2):168-9. PubMed ID: 6691534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Abortion: trouble ahead.
Greenhouse L
N Y Times Web; 1989 Jul; ():A1, A16. PubMed ID: 11647407
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Legal abortion under fierce attack 15 years after Roe v. Wade ruling.
Lewin T
N Y Times Web; 1988 May; ():A20. PubMed ID: 11647387
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Health benefits of legal abortion: an analysis.
Tyrer LB
Plan Parent Rev; 1985; 5(2):24-7. PubMed ID: 12340404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Workability of the undue burden test.
Schneider EA
Temple Law Rev; 1993; 66(3):1003-37. PubMed ID: 11659882
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Abortion: a legal and public health perspective.
Kunins H; Rosenfield A
Annu Rev Public Health; 1991; 12():361-82. PubMed ID: 2049141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The economic impact of state restrictions on abortion: parental consent and notification laws and Medicaid funding restrictions.
Haas-Wilson D
J Policy Anal Manage; 1993; 12(3):498-511. PubMed ID: 10127357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. After Roe v. Wade: 10 years' conflict over abortion.
Peterson B; Barbash F; Russell C
Washington Post; 1983 Jan; ():A1, A12-13. PubMed ID: 11647346
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Partial-birth abortion, Congress, and the Constitution.
Annas GJ
N Engl J Med; 1998 Jul; 339(4):279-83. PubMed ID: 9673308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Planned Parenthood v. Casey: the current state of abortion law.
Berlin SI
Second Opin; 1993 Jan; 18(3):104-9. PubMed ID: 11645221
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Planned Parenthood v Casey. The impact of the new undue burden standard on reproductive health care.
Benshoof J
JAMA; 1993 May; 269(17):2249-57. PubMed ID: 8474205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Recent developments in abortion law in industrialized countries.
Boland R
Law Med Health Care; 1990; 18(4):404-18. PubMed ID: 2089193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
