These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14339720)
1. CAN A SENSORY SYSTEM BE SPECIFIED BY ITS INTERNAL NOISE? EIJKMAN E; VENDRIK AJ J Acoust Soc Am; 1965 Jun; 37():1102-9. PubMed ID: 14339720 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. SOME RELATIONS BETWEEN SMELL AND OTHER SENSORY RESPONSE SYSTEMS. HAHN JF Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1964 Jul; 116():559-63. PubMed ID: 14220548 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A REVIEW OF BIOLOGICAL MECHANISMS FOR APPLICATION TO INSTRUMENT DESIGN. NASA CR-76. HEALER J; HOMONOFF H; JAMIESON C; KIMURA D; KOSLOV S; MERCHANT J; PAPIRNO R NASA Contract Rep NASA CR; 1964 Jul; ():1-306. PubMed ID: 14274660 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN OCULAR AND SKIN PERCEPTION OF LIGHT IN MAN]. SNIAKIN PG Biull Eksp Biol Med; 1964 Aug; 57():16-21. PubMed ID: 14249866 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A visual pattern recognizing computer program based on neurophysiological data. Wallingford EG Behav Sci; 1972 Mar; 17(2):241-8. PubMed ID: 5011958 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Studies on noise tolerance of the inner ear and its relation to certain psychosomatic symptoms]. NESSWETHA W Z Laryngol Rhinol Otol; 1956 Mar; 35(3):213-8. PubMed ID: 13325733 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Some effects of auditory stimuli on the perception of visual flicker. KNOX GW Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom; 1953 Oct; 30(10):520-5. PubMed ID: 13092215 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. STIMULI AFFECTING VOCALIZATIONS AND BASAL SKIN RESISTANCE OF NEONATE CHIMPANZEES. BERKSON G Percept Mot Skills; 1963 Dec; 17():871-4. PubMed ID: 14085119 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [The human sense of sight as information receiver and its relation to the information-receiving properties of the remaining sense organs]. Schober H Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1967 Jul; 79(27):561-4. PubMed ID: 5592605 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. INTERVENING NEURAL ACTIVITY IN VISUAL PERCEPTION: A HYPOTHETICAL CONSTRUCT. TAYAL OP J Gen Psychol; 1965 Apr; 72():199-219. PubMed ID: 14285615 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. MECHANISMS FOR THE TRANSFER OF INFORMATION ALONG THE VISUAL PATHWAYS. MOTOKAWA K Int Rev Neurobiol; 1963; 5():121-81. PubMed ID: 14284593 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Noise-enhanced target discrimination under the influence of fixational eye movements and external noise. Starzynski C; Engbert R Chaos; 2009 Mar; 19(1):015112. PubMed ID: 19335016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. DOGMATISM AND SENSORY ALIENATION: AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION. KAPLAN MF; SINGER E J Consult Psychol; 1963 Dec; 27():486-91. PubMed ID: 14086787 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. IDENTIFICATION AND DISCRIMINATION FUNCTIONS FOR A VISUAL CONTINUUM AND THEIR RELATION TO THE MOTOR THEORY OF SPEECH PERCEPTION. CROSS DV; LANE HL; SHEPPARD WC J Exp Psychol; 1965 Jul; 70():63-74. PubMed ID: 14315132 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The minimum duration of a perception. Efron R Neuropsychologia; 1970 Jan; 8(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 5522547 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The relationship between the duration of a stimulus and the duration of a perception. Efron R Neuropsychologia; 1970 Jan; 8(1):37-55. PubMed ID: 5522546 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]