These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14343262)

  • 1. SELECTION STRATEGIES IN CONCEPT ATTAINMENT AS A FUNCTION OF NUMBER OF PERSONS AND STIMULUS DISPLAY.
    LAUGHLIN PR
    J Exp Psychol; 1965 Sep; 70():323-7. PubMed ID: 14343262
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. RESPONSE PATTERNS AND STRATEGIES IN THE DYNAMICS OF CONCEPT ATTAINMENT BEHAVIOUR.
    EIFERMANN RR
    Br J Psychol; 1965 Aug; 56():217-22. PubMed ID: 14340118
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Selection strategies in concept attainment as a function of number of relevant problem attributes.
    Laughlin PR
    J Exp Psychol; 1966 May; 71(5):773-6. PubMed ID: 5939723
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. CONCEPT ACQUISITION AS A FUNCTION OF STIMULUS-EQUIVALENCE PRETRAINING WITH IDENTICAL AND DISSIMILAR STIMULI.
    PETRE RD
    J Exp Psychol; 1964 Apr; 67():360-4. PubMed ID: 14165650
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cooperative versus competitive concept attainment as a function of sex and stimulus display.
    Laughlin PR; McGlynn RP
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1967 Dec; 7(4):398-402. PubMed ID: 6065867
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. STRATEGIES, TYPE OF SOLUTION, AND STAGE OF LEARNING.
    PETERSON MJ; COLAVITA FB
    J Exp Psychol; 1964 Dec; 68():578-87. PubMed ID: 14241091
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Memory in concept attainment: effects of giving several problems concurrently.
    Restle F; Emmerich D
    J Exp Psychol; 1966 Jun; 71(6):794-9. PubMed ID: 5939356
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Concept attainment by individuals versus cooperative pairs as a function of memory, sex, and concept rule.
    Laughlin PR; McGlynn RP; Anderson JA; Jacobson ES
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1968 Apr; 8(4):410-7. PubMed ID: 5645605
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. BAYESIAN DECISION THEORY, GAME THEORY AND GROUP PROBLEM SOLVING. ESD-TDR-64-603.
    MESSICK DM
    Tech Doc Rep U S Air Force Syst Command Electron Syst Div; 1964 Oct; 69():1-12. PubMed ID: 14313029
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Problem solving in a complex situation].
    Gediga G; Schöttke H; Tücke M
    Arch Psychol (Frankf); 1983; 135(4):325-39. PubMed ID: 6679260
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Selection strategies in conjunctive, disjunctive, and biconditional concept attainment.
    Laughlin PR; Jordan RM
    J Exp Psychol; 1967 Oct; 75(2):188-93. PubMed ID: 6062959
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quantifying the advantages of group process versus individual efforts in problem solving and decision making.
    Haynes DK
    Health Educ; 1988; 19(4):47-8. PubMed ID: 3152233
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Discussion versus memory in cooperative group concept attainment.
    Laughlin PR; Doherty MA
    J Educ Psychol; 1967 Apr; 58(2):123-8. PubMed ID: 6041396
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of stress on group versus individual problem solving.
    Renner J; Renner V
    Psychol Rep; 1972 Apr; 30(2):487-91. PubMed ID: 5024926
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effects of group decision-making process and problem-situation complexity on implementation attempts.
    White SE; Dittrich JE; Lang JR
    Adm Sci Q; 1980 Sep; 25(3):428-40. PubMed ID: 10248232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. SPEED VERSUS MINIMUM-CHOICE INSTRUCTIONS IN CONCEPT ATTAINMENT.
    LAUGHLIN PR
    J Exp Psychol; 1964 Jun; 67():596. PubMed ID: 14155427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. DIFFUSION OF RESPONSIBILITY AND LEVEL OF RISK TAKING IN GROUPS.
    WALLACH MA; KOGAN N; BEM DJ
    J Abnorm Psychol; 1964 Mar; 68():263-74. PubMed ID: 14126840
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On the importance of identifying the correct 'problem space'.
    Keren G
    Cognition; 1984 Mar; 16(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 6540651
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. CUES THAT ELICIT ANALYTIC-DEDUCTIVE METHODS IN CONCEPT ATTAINMENT.
    WICKELGREN WA
    Br J Psychol; 1964 May; 55():143-54. PubMed ID: 14168479
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A level of aspiration model for group decision making.
    Harnett DL
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1967 Jan; 5(1):58-66. PubMed ID: 6031231
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.