These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14344090)
1. SOME CONDITIONS OF THE EFFECT OF RELATIVE SIZE ON PERCEIVED RELATIVE DISTANCE. EPSTEIN W; FRANKLIN S Am J Psychol; 1965 Sep; 78():466-70. PubMed ID: 14344090 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Depth perception in Pandora's box and size illusion: evolution with age. Chevrier J; Delorme A Perception; 1983; 12(2):177-85. PubMed ID: 6657424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Petter's effect in patterns formed by outlined surfaces. Masin SC Percept Mot Skills; 2000 Apr; 90(2):595-600. PubMed ID: 10833759 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Facilitation of stereoscopic depth perception by a relative-size cue in ambiguous disparity stereograms. Fineman MB J Exp Psychol; 1971 Oct; 90(2):215-21. PubMed ID: 5134327 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Illusory Distance Modulates Perceived Size of Afterimage despite the Disappearance of Depth Cues. Qian J; Liu S; Lei Q PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0159228. PubMed ID: 27391335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. THE BEHAVIOURAL BASIS OF PERCEIVED SIZE AND DISTANCE. TAYLOR JG Can J Psychol; 1965 Mar; 19():1-14. PubMed ID: 14304086 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Retinal and assumed size cues as determinants of size and distance perception. BAIRD JC J Exp Psychol; 1963 Aug; 66():155-62. PubMed ID: 13969069 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Pictorial depth and related constancy effects as a function of recognition. Rock I; Shallo J; Schwartz F Perception; 1978; 7(1):3-19. PubMed ID: 628579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Apparent relative size and depth of moving objects. Kaneko H; Uchikawa K Perception; 1993; 22(5):537-47. PubMed ID: 8414880 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. EFFECT OF REDUCTION ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN APPARENT SIZE AND DISTANCE. HARTMAN AM Am J Psychol; 1964 Sep; 77():353-66. PubMed ID: 14198667 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. EFFECTIVE DIFFERENCE IN INFLUENCE OF RELATIVE SIZE ON PERCEIVED RELATIVE DISTANCE. EPSTEIN W Percept Mot Skills; 1964 Apr; 18():383-4. PubMed ID: 14166025 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The interaction of binocular disparity and motion parallax in determining perceived depth and perceived size. Bradshaw MF; Parton AD; Eagle RA Perception; 1998; 27(11):1317-31. PubMed ID: 10505177 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of refractive error on size constancy and shape constancy. Leibowitz HW; Wilcox SB; Post RB Perception; 1978; 7(5):557-62. PubMed ID: 733446 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]