These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14344090)

  • 1. SOME CONDITIONS OF THE EFFECT OF RELATIVE SIZE ON PERCEIVED RELATIVE DISTANCE.
    EPSTEIN W; FRANKLIN S
    Am J Psychol; 1965 Sep; 78():466-70. PubMed ID: 14344090
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Depth perception in Pandora's box and size illusion: evolution with age.
    Chevrier J; Delorme A
    Perception; 1983; 12(2):177-85. PubMed ID: 6657424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Petter's effect in patterns formed by outlined surfaces.
    Masin SC
    Percept Mot Skills; 2000 Apr; 90(2):595-600. PubMed ID: 10833759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Facilitation of stereoscopic depth perception by a relative-size cue in ambiguous disparity stereograms.
    Fineman MB
    J Exp Psychol; 1971 Oct; 90(2):215-21. PubMed ID: 5134327
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. EQUIDISTANCE TENDENCY AND ITS CONSEQUENCES.
    GOGEL WC
    Psychol Bull; 1965 Sep; 64():153-63. PubMed ID: 14343395
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. THE SIZE CUE TO VISUALLY PERCEIVED DISTANCE. AM 64-13.
    GOGEL WC
    Rep Civ Aeromed Res Inst US; 1964 Jan; ():1-25. PubMed ID: 14293289
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. SIZE CUE TO VISUALLY PERCEIVED DISTANCE.
    GOGEL WC
    Psychol Bull; 1964 Oct; 62():217-35. PubMed ID: 14219970
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of familiar size at familiar distances.
    Fitzpatrick V; Pasnak R; Tyer ZE
    Perception; 1982; 11(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 7133938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Shape constancy and polar perspective.
    Wallach H; Marshall FJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1986 Aug; 12(3):338-42. PubMed ID: 2943862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Illusory Distance Modulates Perceived Size of Afterimage despite the Disappearance of Depth Cues.
    Qian J; Liu S; Lei Q
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0159228. PubMed ID: 27391335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. THE BEHAVIOURAL BASIS OF PERCEIVED SIZE AND DISTANCE.
    TAYLOR JG
    Can J Psychol; 1965 Mar; 19():1-14. PubMed ID: 14304086
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Retinal and assumed size cues as determinants of size and distance perception.
    BAIRD JC
    J Exp Psychol; 1963 Aug; 66():155-62. PubMed ID: 13969069
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pictorial depth and related constancy effects as a function of recognition.
    Rock I; Shallo J; Schwartz F
    Perception; 1978; 7(1):3-19. PubMed ID: 628579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Apparent relative size and depth of moving objects.
    Kaneko H; Uchikawa K
    Perception; 1993; 22(5):537-47. PubMed ID: 8414880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. EFFECT OF REDUCTION ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN APPARENT SIZE AND DISTANCE.
    HARTMAN AM
    Am J Psychol; 1964 Sep; 77():353-66. PubMed ID: 14198667
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Perceived rigidity in motion-in-depth increases with contour perspective.
    Vienne C; Blondé L; Mamassian P
    Perception; 2014; 43(6):481-98. PubMed ID: 25154283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Subjective contour: apparent depth or simultaneous brightness contrast?
    Brigner WL; Gallagher MB
    Percept Mot Skills; 1974 Jun; 38(3):1047-53. PubMed ID: 4419257
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. EFFECTIVE DIFFERENCE IN INFLUENCE OF RELATIVE SIZE ON PERCEIVED RELATIVE DISTANCE.
    EPSTEIN W
    Percept Mot Skills; 1964 Apr; 18():383-4. PubMed ID: 14166025
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The interaction of binocular disparity and motion parallax in determining perceived depth and perceived size.
    Bradshaw MF; Parton AD; Eagle RA
    Perception; 1998; 27(11):1317-31. PubMed ID: 10505177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of refractive error on size constancy and shape constancy.
    Leibowitz HW; Wilcox SB; Post RB
    Perception; 1978; 7(5):557-62. PubMed ID: 733446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.