541 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1434769)
1. Abortion on the Supreme Court agenda: Planned Parenthood v. Casey and its possible consequences.
Koslov TI
Law Med Health Care; 1992; 20(3):243-8. PubMed ID: 1434769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Beyond Roe, after Casey: the present and future of a "fundamental" right.
Benshoof J
Womens Health Issues; 1993; 3(3):162-70. PubMed ID: 8274872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The role of women in abortion jurisprudence: from Roe to Casey and beyond.
Martin PA
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1993; 2(3):309-19. PubMed ID: 8293219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Court reaffirms Roe but upholds restrictions.
Fam Plann Perspect; 1992; 24(4):174-7, 185. PubMed ID: 1526274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fetal viability as a threshold to personhood. A legal analysis.
Peterfy A
J Leg Med; 1995 Dec; 16(4):607-36. PubMed ID: 8568420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Planned Parenthood v Casey. The impact of the new undue burden standard on reproductive health care.
Benshoof J
JAMA; 1993 May; 269(17):2249-57. PubMed ID: 8474205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bare court majority reaffirms Roe, but standard for reviewing state laws is relaxed.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1992 Jul; (11):1-3. PubMed ID: 12286280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Supreme Court's spring term: abortion, the right to die, and the decline of privacy rights.
Wing KR
J Health Polit Policy Law; 1990; 15(4):919-28. PubMed ID: 2081895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Supreme Court, abortion, and the jurisprudence of class.
Mariner WK
Am J Public Health; 1992 Nov; 82(11):1556-62. PubMed ID: 1443311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dworkin and Casey on abortion.
Stroud S
Philos Public Aff; 1996; 25(2):140-70. PubMed ID: 11660187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey.
U.S. Supreme Court
Wests Supreme Court Report; 1992 Jun; 112():2791-885. PubMed ID: 12041291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey.
U.S. District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Fed Suppl; 1993 May; 822():227-39. PubMed ID: 11648410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Jane L. v. Bangerter.
U.S. District Court, D. Utah, C.D
Fed Suppl; 1992 Dec; 809():865-80. PubMed ID: 11648409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey.
U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Fed Report; 1991 Oct; 947():682-727. PubMed ID: 11648596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Casey and the resuscitation of Roe v. Wade.
Robertson JA
Hastings Cent Rep; 1992; 22(5):24-8. PubMed ID: 1428831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reproductive rights in jeopardy. The Supreme Court upholds restrictions on abortion.
Gleeson K
ZPG Report; 1992 Sep; 24(4):7. PubMed ID: 12317715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Roe v. Wade reaffirmed, again.
Annas GJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1986 Oct; 16(5):26-7. PubMed ID: 3771197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Abortion and informed consent requirements.
Kapp MB
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1982 Sep; 144(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 7114096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey: the reaffirmation of Roe or the beginning of the end?
Henry KS
Univ Louisv J Fam Law; 1993-1994 Winter; 32(1):93-113. PubMed ID: 11660011
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Reading Casey: structuring the woman's decisionmaking process.
Goldstein RD
William Mary Bill Rights J; 1996; 4(3):787-880. PubMed ID: 11660789
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
