These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1435152)

  • 1. [Optimization of the performance of electric defibrillation of the heart].
    Amosov GG; Fomichev DI
    Med Tekh; 1992; (4):7-9. PubMed ID: 1435152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sequential pulse defibrillation for implantable defibrillators.
    Bourland JD; Tacker WA; Wessale JL; Kallok MJ; Graf JE; Geddes LA
    Med Instrum; 1986; 20(3):138-42. PubMed ID: 3724587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Electrical defibrillation optimization: an automated, iterative parallel finite-element approach.
    Hutchinson SA; Ng KT; Shadid JN; Nadeem A
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1997 Apr; 44(4):278-89. PubMed ID: 9125810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Finite element analysis of cardiac defibrillation current distributions.
    Sepulveda NG; Wikswo JP; Echt DS
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1990 Apr; 37(4):354-65. PubMed ID: 2338348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The shape of high-voltage impulse and the effect of defibrillation].
    Moroz VV; Bogushevich MS; Vostrikov VA; Kozlova EK; Chernysh AM
    Anesteziol Reanimatol; 2002; (6):60-3. PubMed ID: 12611162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Orthogonal field calibration analysis for myocardial electrode arrays used in defibrillation studies.
    Deale OC; Ng KT; Lerman BB
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Dec; 55(12):2823-6. PubMed ID: 19126463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Electrical current distribution under transthoracic defibrillation and pacing electrodes.
    Papazov S; Kostov Z; Daskalov I
    J Med Eng Technol; 2002; 26(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 11924843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Control of high common mode voltage during transthoracic defibrillation.
    Deale OC; Ng KT; Kim EJ; Lerman BB
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1995 Dec; 42(12):1208-11. PubMed ID: 8550063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Simplified calibration of single-plunge bipolar electrode array for field measurement during defibrillation.
    Deale OC; Ng KT; Kim-Van Housen EJ; Lerman BB
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Oct; 49(10):1211-4. PubMed ID: 12374347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Optimization of cardiac defibrillation by three-dimensional finite element modeling of the human thorax.
    Panescu D; Webster JG; Tompkins WJ; Stratbucker RA
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1995 Feb; 42(2):185-92. PubMed ID: 7868146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Transthoracic defibrillation of heart ventricles: effectiveness and safety of mono- and bipolar impulses].
    Vostrikov VA; Bogushevich MS; Kholin PV
    Anesteziol Reanimatol; 1994; (5):9-11. PubMed ID: 7893086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A new approach to optimization-based defibrillation.
    Muzdeka S; Barbieri E
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 2001; 37():319-24. PubMed ID: 11347410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of biventricular and conventional transvenous defibrillation: a computational study using patient derived models.
    Mocanu D; Kettenbach J; Sweeney MO; Kikinis R; Kenknight BH; Eisenberg SR
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2004 May; 27(5):586-93. PubMed ID: 15125713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optimization of feedback pacing for defibrillation.
    Puwal S; Roth BJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2009 Feb; 56(2):532-4. PubMed ID: 19342333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Optimization of epicardial electrode size and implant site for reduced sequential pulse defibrillation thresholds.
    Kallok MJ; Bourland JD; Tacker WA; Jones DL; Klein GJ; Wessale JL
    Med Instrum; 1986; 20(1):36-9. PubMed ID: 3959941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimating the 95% effective defibrillation dose.
    Malkin RA; Burdick DS; Johnson EE; Pilkington TC; Swanson DK; Ideker RE
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1993 Mar; 40(3):256-65. PubMed ID: 8335329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A percutaneous catheter-based system for the measurement of potential gradients applicable to the study of transthoracic defibrillation.
    Rosborough JP; Deno DC; Walker RG; Niemann JT
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2007 Feb; 30(2):166-74. PubMed ID: 17338711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of myocardial infarction on catheter defibrillation threshold.
    Babbs CF; Paris RL; Tacker WA; Bourland JD
    Med Instrum; 1983; 17(1):18-20. PubMed ID: 6843409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. From defibrillation theory to clinical implications.
    Irnich W
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2010 Jul; 33(7):814-25. PubMed ID: 20025700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ventricular defibrillation with myocardial electrodes in the dog, calf, pony, and pig.
    Gold JH; Schuder JC; Stoeckle H
    Med Instrum; 1980; 14(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 7354731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.