These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1435266)

  • 1. The influence of retrieval on retention.
    Carrier M; Pashler H
    Mem Cognit; 1992 Nov; 20(6):633-42. PubMed ID: 1435266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Practicing more retrieval routes leads to greater memory retention.
    Zheng J; Zhang W; Li T; Liu Z; Luo L
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Sep; 169():109-18. PubMed ID: 27270228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. What types of learning are enhanced by a cued recall test?
    Carpenter SK; Pashler H; Vul E
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Oct; 13(5):826-30. PubMed ID: 17328380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impoverished cue support enhances subsequent retention: support for the elaborative retrieval explanation of the testing effect.
    Carpenter SK; DeLosh EL
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Mar; 34(2):268-76. PubMed ID: 16752591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. No retrieval-induced forgetting using item-specific independent cues: evidence against a general inhibitory account.
    Camp G; Pecher D; Schmidt HG
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Sep; 33(5):950-8. PubMed ID: 17723071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Altering memory through recall: the effects of cue-guided retrieval processing.
    McDaniel MA; Kowitz MD; Dunay PK
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Jul; 17(4):423-34. PubMed ID: 2761400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Selective access in cued recall: the roles of retrieval cues and domains of encoding.
    McEvoy CL; Nelson DL
    Mem Cognit; 1990 Jan; 18(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 2314223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Word frequency effects in associative and item recognition.
    Clark SE
    Mem Cognit; 1992 May; 20(3):231-43. PubMed ID: 1508049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of study time distribution on learning and retention: a Goldilocks principle for presentation rate.
    de Jonge M; Tabbers HK; Pecher D; Zeelenberg R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Mar; 38(2):405-12. PubMed ID: 22004269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Retrieval processes in recognition and cued recall.
    Nobel PA; Shiffrin RM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Mar; 27(2):384-413. PubMed ID: 11294440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Retrieval-induced forgetting in item recognition: evidence for a reduction in general memory strength.
    Spitzer B; Bäuml KH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Sep; 33(5):863-75. PubMed ID: 17723065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The role of attention in automatization: does attention operate at encoding, or retrieval, or both?
    Boronat CB; Logan GD
    Mem Cognit; 1997 Jan; 25(1):36-46. PubMed ID: 9046868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sequential effects in lexical decision: tests of compound-cue retrieval theory.
    Ratcliff R; McKoon G
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1995 Sep; 21(5):1380-8. PubMed ID: 8744970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Enhancing retention through reconsolidation: negative emotional arousal following retrieval enhances later recall.
    Finn B; Roediger HL
    Psychol Sci; 2011 Jun; 22(6):781-6. PubMed ID: 21537055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of varied and constant environmental contexts on acquisition and retention.
    Smith SM; Handy JD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Nov; 40(6):1582-93. PubMed ID: 24797444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessing the inhibitory account of retrieval-induced forgetting with implicit-memory tests.
    Perfect TJ; Moulin CJ; Conway MA; Perry E
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Nov; 28(6):1111-9. PubMed ID: 12450336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Associative recognition: a case of recall-to-reject processing.
    Rotello CM; Heit E
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Sep; 28(6):907-22. PubMed ID: 11105517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. When does testing enhance retention? A distribution-based interpretation of retrieval as a memory modifier.
    Halamish V; Bjork RA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jul; 37(4):801-12. PubMed ID: 21480751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of list organization and retrieval cues on children's delayed recall.
    Ramisetty-Mikler S
    J Genet Psychol; 1992 Dec; 153(4):421-33. PubMed ID: 1295954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A retrieval account of the long-term modality effect.
    Glenberg AM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1984 Jan; 10(1):16-31. PubMed ID: 6242733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.