These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1435267)

  • 61. Even frequent and expected words are not identified without spatial attention.
    Lien MC; Ruthruff E; Kouchi S; Lachter J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 May; 72(4):973-88. PubMed ID: 20436194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Children's associative learning: automatic and deliberate encoding of meaningful associations.
    Guttentag R
    Am J Psychol; 1995; 108(1):99-114. PubMed ID: 7733414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Concreteness effects in free recall: the roles of imaginal and relational processing.
    Marschark M; Surian L
    Mem Cognit; 1992 Nov; 20(6):612-20. PubMed ID: 1435264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. The effect of study time distribution on learning and retention: a Goldilocks principle for presentation rate.
    de Jonge M; Tabbers HK; Pecher D; Zeelenberg R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Mar; 38(2):405-12. PubMed ID: 22004269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Metamemory judgments and the benefits of repeated study: improving recall predictions through the activation of appropriate knowledge.
    Tiede HL; Leboe JP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 May; 35(3):822-8. PubMed ID: 19379052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Contextual facilitation of lexical processing in Alzheimer's disease: intralexical priming or sentence-level priming?
    Nebes RD
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1994 Aug; 16(4):489-97. PubMed ID: 7962353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. The effects of environmental context on recognition memory and claims of remembering.
    Hockley WE
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1412-29. PubMed ID: 18980405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Release from generation failure: the role of study list structure.
    Higham PA; Tam H
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Jan; 34(1):148-57. PubMed ID: 16686114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Accessing the particular from the general: the power of distinctiveness in the context of organization.
    Hunt RR; Smith RE
    Mem Cognit; 1996 Mar; 24(2):217-25. PubMed ID: 8881324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Similarity information versus relational information: differences in the time course of retrieval.
    Ratcliff R; McKoon G
    Cogn Psychol; 1989 Apr; 21(2):139-55. PubMed ID: 2706926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Situation models and abstract ownership relations.
    Radvansky GA; Wyer RS; Curiel JM; Lutz MF
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1997 Sep; 23(5):1233-46. PubMed ID: 9293632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. The ties that bind what is known to the recognition of what is new.
    Nelson DL; Zhang N; McKinney VM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Sep; 27(5):1147-59. PubMed ID: 11550743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. The effects of "effort after meaning" on recall: differences in within- and between-subjects designs.
    Zaromb FM; Roediger HL
    Mem Cognit; 2009 Jun; 37(4):447-63. PubMed ID: 19460952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Response distribution as an explanation of the mirror effect.
    Glanzer M; Kim K; Adams JK
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1998 May; 24(3):633-44. PubMed ID: 9606930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Sex differences in elaborative strategies: a developmental analysis.
    Waters HS; Schreiber LL
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1991 Dec; 52(3):319-35. PubMed ID: 1770331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Reverse-interference effect in free recall.
    Thapar A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1996 Mar; 22(2):430-7. PubMed ID: 8901344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. What is this thing called frequency?
    Nelson DL; McEvoy CL
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Jun; 28(4):509-22. PubMed ID: 10946534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Cue set size effects: sampling activated associates or cross-target interference?
    Nelson DL; Schreiber TA; Xu J
    Mem Cognit; 1999 May; 27(3):465-77. PubMed ID: 10355236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. What is preexisting strength? Predicting free association probabilities, similarity ratings, and cued recall probabilities.
    Nelson DL; Dyrdal GM; Goodmon LB
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2005 Aug; 12(4):711-9. PubMed ID: 16447386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Recognition failure and the composite memory trace in CHARM.
    Metcalfe J
    Psychol Rev; 1991 Oct; 98(4):529-53. PubMed ID: 1961772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.