141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1435270)
1. The retrieval of controlled and automatic aspects of meaning on direct and indirect tests.
Nelson DL; Schreiber TA; Holley PE
Mem Cognit; 1992 Nov; 20(6):671-84. PubMed ID: 1435270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Selective access in cued recall: the roles of retrieval cues and domains of encoding.
McEvoy CL; Nelson DL
Mem Cognit; 1990 Jan; 18(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 2314223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Probing memory with conceptual cues at multiple retention intervals: a comparison of forgetting rates on implicit and explicit tests.
Goshen-Gottstein Y; Kempinsky H
Psychon Bull Rev; 2001 Mar; 8(1):139-46. PubMed ID: 11340859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Recency effects in direct and indirect memory tasks.
McKenzie WA; Humphreys MS
Mem Cognit; 1991 Jul; 19(4):321-31. PubMed ID: 1895942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The properties of retrieval cues constrain the picture superiority effect.
Weldon MS; Roediger HL; Challis BH
Mem Cognit; 1989 Jan; 17(1):95-105. PubMed ID: 2913461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Word-fragment cuing: the lexical search hypothesis.
Nelson DL; Keelean PD; Negrao M
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1989 May; 15(3):388-97. PubMed ID: 2524544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparing word fragment completion and cued recall with letter cues.
Nelson DL; Canas JJ; Bajo MT; Keelean PD
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1987 Oct; 13(4):542-52. PubMed ID: 2959738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prior knowledge and cued recall: category size and dominance.
Nelson DL; Bajo MT
Am J Psychol; 1985; 98(4):503-17. PubMed ID: 4096333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of implicit memory on explicit recall: set size and word-frequency effects.
Nelson DL; Xu J
Psychol Res; 1995; 57(3-4):203-14. PubMed ID: 7753950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. High-priority event instructions affect implicit and explicit memory tests.
Guynn MJ; Roediger HL
Psychol Res; 1995; 57(3-4):192-202. PubMed ID: 7753949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Does organization improve priming?
Rappold VA; Hashtroudi S
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1991 Jan; 17(1):103-14. PubMed ID: 1826727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Contingent dissociation between recognition and fragment completion: the method of triangulation.
Hayman CA; Tulving E
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1989 Mar; 15(2):228-40. PubMed ID: 2522512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Lexical and semantic search in cued recall, fragment completion, perceptual identification, and recognition.
Nelson DL; McEvoy CL; Bajo MT
Am J Psychol; 1988; 101(4):465-80. PubMed ID: 3232723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The tip-of-the-tongue phenomenon: blocking or partial activation?
Meyer AS; Bock K
Mem Cognit; 1992 Nov; 20(6):715-26. PubMed ID: 1435274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prior knowledge: the effects of natural category size on memory for implicitly encoded concepts.
Nelson DL; Bajo MT; McEvoy CL; Schreiber TA
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1989 Sep; 15(5):957-67. PubMed ID: 2528608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Priming and false memories from Deese-Roediger-McDermott lists on a fragment completion test with children.
Diliberto-Macaluso KA
Am J Psychol; 2005; 118(1):13-28. PubMed ID: 15822608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Even frequent and expected words are not identified without spatial attention.
Lien MC; Ruthruff E; Kouchi S; Lachter J
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 May; 72(4):973-88. PubMed ID: 20436194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effects of generation on auditory implicit memory.
Dew IT; Mulligan NW
Mem Cognit; 2008 Sep; 36(6):1157-67. PubMed ID: 18927034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. What types of learning are enhanced by a cued recall test?
Carpenter SK; Pashler H; Vul E
Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Oct; 13(5):826-30. PubMed ID: 17328380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Automatic and directed search processes in solving simple semantic-memory problems.
Ben-Zur H
Mem Cognit; 1989 Sep; 17(5):617-26. PubMed ID: 2796746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]