These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1435275)

  • 1. Controlling Stroop effects by manipulating expectations for color words.
    Tzelgov J; Henik A; Berger J
    Mem Cognit; 1992 Nov; 20(6):727-35. PubMed ID: 1435275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A horse race of a different color: Stroop interference patterns with transformed words.
    Dunbar K; MacLeod CM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1984 Oct; 10(5):622-39. PubMed ID: 6238123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Attention and facilitation: converging information versus inadvertent reading in Stroop task performance.
    Roelofs A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Mar; 36(2):411-22. PubMed ID: 20192539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. When the visual format of the color carrier word does and does not modulate the stroop effect.
    Blais C; Besner D
    Mem Cognit; 2005 Dec; 33(8):1337-44. PubMed ID: 16615381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Disentangling Genuine Semantic Stroop Effects in Reading from Contingency Effects: On the Need for Two Neutral Baselines.
    Lorentz E; McKibben T; Ekstrand C; Gould L; Anton K; Borowsky R
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():386. PubMed ID: 27014177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stroop process dissociations: the relationship between facilitation and interference.
    Lindsay DS; Jacoby LL
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1994 Apr; 20(2):219-34. PubMed ID: 8189189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mechanisms underlying reduction in Stroop interference with practice for young and old adults.
    Dulaney CL; Rogers WA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1994 Mar; 20(2):470-84. PubMed ID: 8151280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A rational look at the emotional stroop phenomenon: a generic slowdown, not a stroop effect.
    Algom D; Chajut E; Lev S
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2004 Sep; 133(3):323-38. PubMed ID: 15355142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Why do non-color words interfere with color naming?
    Burt JS
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2002 Oct; 28(5):1019-38. PubMed ID: 12421053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Attention, temporal predictability, and the time course of context effects in naming performance.
    Roelofs A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Feb; 133(2):146-53. PubMed ID: 19963201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Stroop interference is affected in inhibition of return.
    Vivas AB; Fuentes LJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2001 Jun; 8(2):315-23. PubMed ID: 11495120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Training on integrated versus separated Stroop tasks: the progression of interference and facilitation.
    MacLeod CM
    Mem Cognit; 1998 Mar; 26(2):201-11. PubMed ID: 9584429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Disinhibition of automatic word reading in Parkinson's disease.
    Henik A; Singh J; Beckley DJ; Rafal RD
    Cortex; 1993 Dec; 29(4):589-99. PubMed ID: 8124936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stroop dilution depends on the nature of the color carrier but not on its location.
    Cho YS; Lien MC; Proctor RW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Aug; 32(4):826-39. PubMed ID: 16846282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of response type and set size on Stroop color-word performance.
    McClain L
    Percept Mot Skills; 1983 Jun; 56(3):735-43. PubMed ID: 6877960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On the control of automatic processes: a parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect.
    Cohen JD; Dunbar K; McClelland JL
    Psychol Rev; 1990 Jul; 97(3):332-61. PubMed ID: 2200075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A problem in measuring the Stroop facilitation and interference effects: implications for measuring performance change in general.
    Chen JY
    Percept Mot Skills; 1996 Dec; 83(3 Pt 1):1059-70. PubMed ID: 8961342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Time course analysis of the Stroop phenomenon.
    Glaser MO; Glaser WR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1982 Dec; 8(6):875-94. PubMed ID: 6218237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bilingualism and adult differences in inhibitory mechanisms: evidence from a bilingual stroop task.
    Mohamed Zied K; Phillipe A; Pinon K; Havet-Thomassin V; Aubin G; Roy A; Le Gall D
    Brain Cogn; 2004 Apr; 54(3):254-6. PubMed ID: 15050787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The semantic Stroop effect is controlled by endogenous attention.
    Kinoshita S; Mills L; Norris D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Nov; 44(11):1730-1742. PubMed ID: 29672118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.