122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1435408)
1. A mammographic screening pilot project in Victoria 1988-1990. The Essendon Breast X-ray Program Collaborative Group.
Med J Aust; 1992 Nov; 157(10):670-3. PubMed ID: 1435408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Texas Breast Screening Project: Part I. Mammographic and clinical results.
Peters GN; Vogel VG; Evans WP; Bondy M; Halabi S; Lord J; Laville EA
South Med J; 1993 Apr; 86(4):385-90. PubMed ID: 8465213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparing the performance of mammography screening in the USA and the UK.
Smith-Bindman R; Ballard-Barbash R; Miglioretti DL; Patnick J; Kerlikowske K
J Med Screen; 2005; 12(1):50-4. PubMed ID: 15814020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of screening mammography in the United States and the United kingdom.
Smith-Bindman R; Chu PW; Miglioretti DL; Sickles EA; Blanks R; Ballard-Barbash R; Bobo JK; Lee NC; Wallis MG; Patnick J; Kerlikowske K
JAMA; 2003 Oct; 290(16):2129-37. PubMed ID: 14570948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The impact of mammography on breast biopsy.
Goedde TA; Frykberg ER; Crump JM; Lay SF; Turetsky DB; Linden SS
Am Surg; 1992 Nov; 58(11):661-6. PubMed ID: 1485695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of recall rate on earlier screen detection of breast cancers based on the Dutch performance indicators.
Otten JD; Karssemeijer N; Hendriks JH; Groenewoud JH; Fracheboud J; Verbeek AL; de Koning HJ; Holland R
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 May; 97(10):748-54. PubMed ID: 15900044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mammographic screening: measurement of the cost in a population based programme in Victoria, Australia.
Hurley SF; Livingston PM; Thane N; Quang L
J Epidemiol Community Health; 1994 Aug; 48(4):391-9. PubMed ID: 7964340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program: report on the first 4 years of mammography provided to medically underserved women.
May DS; Lee NC; Nadel MR; Henson RM; Miller DS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jan; 170(1):97-104. PubMed ID: 9423608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Spectrum of abnormal mammographic findings and their predictive value for malignancy in Singaporean women from a population screening trial.
Sng KW; Ng EH; Ng FC; Tan PH; Low SC; Chiang G; Ho GH; Ng LT; Wilde C; Tan KP
Ann Acad Med Singap; 2000 Jul; 29(4):457-62. PubMed ID: 11056775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Frequency and predictive value of a mammographic recommendation for short-interval follow-up.
Yasmeen S; Romano PS; Pettinger M; Chlebowski RT; Robbins JA; Lane DS; Hendrix SL
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2003 Mar; 95(6):429-36. PubMed ID: 12644536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. One-view breast tomosynthesis versus two-view mammography in the Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial (MBTST): a prospective, population-based, diagnostic accuracy study.
Zackrisson S; Lång K; Rosso A; Johnson K; Dustler M; Förnvik D; Förnvik H; Sartor H; Timberg P; Tingberg A; Andersson I
Lancet Oncol; 2018 Nov; 19(11):1493-1503. PubMed ID: 30322817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Breast cancer early diagnosis experience in Florence: can a self referral policy achieve the results of service screening?
Giorgi D; Paci E; Zappa M; Rosselli del Turco M
J Epidemiol Community Health; 1994 Oct; 48(5):471-5. PubMed ID: 7964357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Responding to the challenges of breast cancer in egypt and other arab countries.
El Saghir NS
J Egypt Natl Canc Inst; 2008 Dec; 20(4):309-12. PubMed ID: 20571588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Performance of a subsidised mammographic screening programme in Malaysia, a middle-income Asian country.
Lee M; Mariapun S; Rajaram N; Teo SH; Yip CH
BMC Public Health; 2017 Jan; 17(1):127. PubMed ID: 28129762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Texas Breast Screening Project: Part II. Demographics, risk profiles, and health practices of participants.
Vogel VG; Bondy M; Halabi S; Lord J; Laville EA
South Med J; 1993 Apr; 86(4):391-6. PubMed ID: 8465214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Screening mammography in Finland--1.5 million examinations with 97 percent specificity. Mammography Working Group, Radiological Society of Finland.
Dean PB; Pamilo M
Acta Oncol; 1999; 38 Suppl 13():47-54. PubMed ID: 10612496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Long term breast cancer screening in Nijmegen, The Netherlands: the nine rounds from 1975-92.
Otten JD; van Dijck JA; Peer PG; Straatman H; Verbeek AL; Mravunac M; Hendriks JH; Holland R
J Epidemiol Community Health; 1996 Jun; 50(3):353-8. PubMed ID: 8935470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Results from the Swiss mammography screening pilot programme.
Bulliard JL; De Landtsheer JP; Levi F
Eur J Cancer; 2003 Aug; 39(12):1761-9. PubMed ID: 12888372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mammographic screening: patterns of use and estimated impact on breast carcinoma survival.
Blanchard K; Colbert JA; Puri D; Weissman J; Moy B; Kopans DB; Kaine EM; Moore RH; Halpern EF; Hughes KS; Tanabe KK; Smith BL; Michaelson JS
Cancer; 2004 Aug; 101(3):495-507. PubMed ID: 15274062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Screening mammography: value in women 35-39 years old.
Liberman L; Dershaw DD; Deutch BM; Thaler HT; Lippin BS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Jul; 161(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 8517320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
