These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14354599)
1. The validity of thematic projective technique interpretations. LITTLE KB; SHNEIDMAN ES J Pers; 1955 Mar; 23(3):285-94. PubMed ID: 14354599 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The use of projective assessment techniques in pediatric research. Poster EC J Pediatr Nurs; 1989 Feb; 4(1):26-35. PubMed ID: 2646424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The validity of projective interpretations of art products of mentally retarded individuals. POPPLESTONE JA Am J Ment Defic; 1954 Oct; 59(2):263-5. PubMed ID: 13197440 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The semantic validity of TAT interpretations. DAVENPORT BF J Consult Psychol; 1952 Jun; 16(3):71-5. PubMed ID: 14946280 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Variability of responses and the stability of scores and interpretations of projective protocols. FISKE DW J Proj Tech; 1959 Sep; 23():263-7. PubMed ID: 13823280 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A conceptual model of projective techniques applied to stimulus variations with thematic techniques. MURSTEIN BI J Consult Psychol; 1959 Feb; 23(1):3-14. PubMed ID: 13641483 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A scoring scheme for the TAT and other verbal projective techniques. FINE R J Proj Tech; 1955 Sep; 19(3):306-9. PubMed ID: 13243387 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The magnitude of four experimental needs as expressed by two projective techniques. THEINER EC J Proj Tech; 1962 Sep; 26():354-65. PubMed ID: 13920531 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Manual for a scoring scheme for verbal projective techniques (TAT, MAPS, stories and the like). FINE R J Proj Tech; 1955 Sep; 19(3):310-6. PubMed ID: 13243388 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. VALIDITY OF THE ROSENZWEIG PICTURE-FRUSTRATION STUDY WITH FELONS AND DELINQUENTS. ROSENZWEIG S J Consult Psychol; 1963 Dec; 27():535-6. PubMed ID: 14086797 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A critique of Lilienfeld et al.'s (2000) "The scientific status of projective techniques". Hibbard S J Pers Assess; 2003 Jun; 80(3):260-71. PubMed ID: 12763700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparing diagnostic validity of the TAT and a new picture projective test. Sharkey KJ; Ritzler BA J Pers Assess; 1985 Aug; 49(4):406-12. PubMed ID: 3900331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Differential prediction of a specific behavior from three projective techniques. VERNIER CM; WHITING JF; MELTZER ML J Consult Psychol; 1955 Jun; 19(3):175-82. PubMed ID: 14381550 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. FREQUENCY HYPOTHESIS AND CONTENT ANALYSIS OF PROJECTIVE TECHNIQUES. WALLACE J; SECHREST L J Consult Psychol; 1963 Oct; 27():387-93. PubMed ID: 14076394 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [What drugs users say and do not say, using experiences and the projective technique]. de Farias FL; Furegato AR Rev Lat Am Enfermagem; 2005; 13(5):700-7. PubMed ID: 16308627 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Projective methods and dangerous behavior]. Mormont C Acta Psychiatr Belg; 1988; 88(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 3051890 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The use of projective techniques in pediatric nursing research from 1984 to 1993. Bellack JP; Fleming JW J Pediatr Nurs; 1996 Feb; 11(1):10-28. PubMed ID: 8867218 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The validity of projective techniques and their research and clinical contribution. Blatt SJ J Pers Assess; 1975 Aug; 39(4):327-43. PubMed ID: 1104801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]