114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1435485)
1. The Papanicolaou smear histories of 237 patients with cervical cancer.
Grace J
Med J Aust; 1992 Sep; 157(5):353. PubMed ID: 1435485
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The Papanicolaou smear histories of 237 patients with cervical cancer.
Wain GV; Farnsworth A; Hacker NF
Med J Aust; 1992 Jul; 157(1):14-6. PubMed ID: 1640883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Papanicolaou smear. Medicine's most successful cancer screening procedure is threatened.
Austin RM; McLendon WW
JAMA; 1997 Mar; 277(9):754-5. PubMed ID: 9042850
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Sampling, sampling errors and specimen preparation.
Baandrup U; Bishop JW; Bonfiglio TA; Branca M; Hutchinson ML; Laverty CR; Ahmad J; Illescas LT; Obwegeser JH; Patnick J; Pogacnik A; Rosenthal DL; Suprun HZ; Verhest A; Richart RM
Acta Cytol; 2000; 44(6):944-8. PubMed ID: 11127750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The false-negative fraction: a statistical method to measure the efficacy of cervical smear screening laboratories.
Dolinar J; Ollayos CW; Tellado M; Ali I; Stevens A; Paquette C; Brodbelt S
Mil Med; 1999 Jun; 164(6):410-1. PubMed ID: 10377709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Papanicolaou smear histories of 237 patients with cervical cancer.
Hughes PD
Med J Aust; 1992 Sep; 157(5):353. PubMed ID: 1435486
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Quality assurance in cervical cytology. The Papanicolaou smear. Council on Scientific Affairs.
JAMA; 1989 Sep 22-29; 262(12):1672-9. PubMed ID: 2671421
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Pap smear.
Mehta V; Vasanth V; Balachandran C
Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol; 2009; 75(2):214-6. PubMed ID: 19293526
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Update on the Papanicolaou smear: new issues for the 1990s.
Ollayos CW
Mil Med; 1997 Aug; 162(8):521-3. PubMed ID: 9271901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The adequate Papanicolaou smear revisited.
Greening SE
Diagn Cytopathol; 1985; 1(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 3836072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Common problems in Papanicolaou smear interpretation.
DeMay RM
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Mar; 121(3):229-38. PubMed ID: 9111106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Does gel affect cytology or comfort in the screening papanicolaou smear?
Gilson M; Desai A; Cardoza-Favarato G; Vroman P; Thornton JA
J Am Board Fam Med; 2006; 19(4):340-4. PubMed ID: 16809647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pap smear refined.
Oncology (Williston Park); 1997 Aug; 11(8):1125. PubMed ID: 9268975
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. In vitro adjuncts to the pap smear.
Felix JC; Amezcua C
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2002 Dec; 29(4):685-99, vii. PubMed ID: 12509092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Regulatory closure of cervical cytology laboratories: recommendations for a public health response.
MMWR Recomm Rep; 1997 Dec; 46(RR-17):1-19. PubMed ID: 9409538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quality and liability issues with the Papanicolaou smear.
Sirota RL
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Dec; 121(12):1237-8. PubMed ID: 9431309
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A decade has passed...the Pap smear and cervical cancer.
Linder J
Am J Clin Pathol; 1997 Nov; 108(5):492-8. PubMed ID: 9353086
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Pap smears. Do them right and every year--forever!
Gall SA
Postgrad Med; 1989 May; 85(6):235-9. PubMed ID: 2710727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The determination of Papanicolaou smear adequacy using a semiquantitative method to evaluate cellularity.
Valente PT; Schantz HD; Trabal JF
Diagn Cytopathol; 1991; 7(6):576-80. PubMed ID: 1769285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Death of the Papanicolaou smear? A tale of three reasons.
Boronow RC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Aug; 179(2):391-6. PubMed ID: 9731843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
