These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1435595)

  • 1. Application of the EM algorithm to radiographic images.
    Brailean JC; Little D; Giger ML; Chen CT; Sullivan BJ
    Med Phys; 1992; 19(5):1175-82. PubMed ID: 1435595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Investigation of basic imaging properties in digital radiography. 4. Effect of unsharp masking on the detectability of simple patterns.
    Loo LN; Doi K; Metz CE
    Med Phys; 1985; 12(2):209-14. PubMed ID: 4000078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Digital mammography. ROC studies of the effects of pixel size and unsharp-mask filtering on the detection of subtle microcalcifications.
    Chan HP; Vyborny CJ; MacMahon H; Metz CE; Doi K; Sickles EA
    Invest Radiol; 1987 Jul; 22(7):581-9. PubMed ID: 3623862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluating image reconstruction methods for tumor detection in 3-dimensional whole-body PET oncology imaging.
    Lartizien C; Kinahan PE; Swensson R; Comtat C; Lin M; Villemagne V; Trébossen R
    J Nucl Med; 2003 Feb; 44(2):276-90. PubMed ID: 12571221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Implementation and evaluation of an ordered subsets reconstruction algorithm for transmission PET studies using median root prior and inter-update median filtering.
    Bettinardi V; Alenius S; Numminen P; Teräs M; Gilardi MC; Fazio F; Ruotsalainen U
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2003 Feb; 30(2):222-31. PubMed ID: 12552340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Expectation maximization reconstruction of positron emission tomography images using anatomical magnetic resonance information.
    Lipinski B; Herzog H; Rota Kops E; Oberschelp W; Müller-Gärtner HW
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1997 Apr; 16(2):129-36. PubMed ID: 9101322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Detection of subtle microcalcifications: comparison of computed radiography and screen-film mammography.
    Higashida Y; Moribe N; Morita K; Katsuda N; Hatemura M; Takada T; Takahashi M; Yamashita J
    Radiology; 1992 May; 183(2):483-6. PubMed ID: 1561354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [ROC analysis of image quality in digital luminescence radiography in comparison with current film-screen systems in mammography].
    Wiebringhaus R; John V; Müller RD; Hirche H; Voss M; Callies R
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1995 Jul; 5(4):263-7. PubMed ID: 7548257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improvement in PET/CT image quality with a combination of point-spread function and time-of-flight in relation to reconstruction parameters.
    Akamatsu G; Ishikawa K; Mitsumoto K; Taniguchi T; Ohya N; Baba S; Abe K; Sasaki M
    J Nucl Med; 2012 Nov; 53(11):1716-22. PubMed ID: 22952340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of reconstruction algorithms for C-arm mammography tomosynthesis.
    Rakowski JT; Dennis MJ
    Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):3018-32. PubMed ID: 16964880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Iterative algebraic reconstruction algorithms for emission computed tomography: a unified framework and its application to positron emission tomography.
    Xu XL; Liow JS; Strother SC
    Med Phys; 1993; 20(6):1675-84. PubMed ID: 8309440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An improved ordered subsets expectation maximization positron emission computerized tomography reconstruction.
    Chen H; Lei X; Yao D
    Comput Biol Med; 2007 Dec; 37(12):1780-5. PubMed ID: 17624322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Acceleration of MAP-EM algorithm via over-relaxation.
    Tsai YJ; Huang HM; Fang YH; Chang SI; Hsiao IT
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2015 Mar; 40():100-7. PubMed ID: 25465068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Radiologists' preferences for digital mammographic display. The International Digital Mammography Development Group.
    Pisano ED; Cole EB; Major S; Zong S; Hemminger BM; Muller KE; Johnston RE; Walsh R; Conant E; Fajardo LL; Feig SA; Nishikawa RM; Yaffe MJ; Williams MB; Aylward SR
    Radiology; 2000 Sep; 216(3):820-30. PubMed ID: 10966717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Anatomical-based FDG-PET reconstruction for the detection of hypo-metabolic regions in epilepsy.
    Baete K; Nuyts J; Van Paesschen W; Suetens P; Dupont P
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2004 Apr; 23(4):510-9. PubMed ID: 15084076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analyser-based mammography using single-image reconstruction.
    Briedis D; Siu KK; Paganin DM; Pavlov KM; Lewis RA
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Aug; 50(15):3599-611. PubMed ID: 16030385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A study on mastectomy samples to evaluate breast imaging quality and potential clinical relevance of differential phase contrast mammography.
    Hauser N; Wang Z; Kubik-Huch RA; Trippel M; Singer G; Hohl MK; Roessl E; Köhler T; van Stevendaal U; Wieberneit N; Stampanoni M
    Invest Radiol; 2014 Mar; 49(3):131-7. PubMed ID: 24141742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Region-based wavelet coding methods for digital mammography.
    Penedo M; Pearlman WA; Tahoces PG; Souto M; Vidal JJ
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2003 Oct; 22(10):1288-96. PubMed ID: 14552582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Digital image processing: effect on detectability of simulated low-contrast radiographic patterns.
    Ishida M; Doi K; Loo LN; Metz CE; Lehr JL
    Radiology; 1984 Feb; 150(2):569-75. PubMed ID: 6691118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A focus-of-attention preprocessing scheme for EM-ML PET reconstruction.
    Gregor J; Huff DA
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1997 Apr; 16(2):218-23. PubMed ID: 9101331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.