These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
71 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1435597)
1. Some noise properties of 2DFT MR images from asymmetrically sampled data. Hua J; Hurst GC; Duerk JL Med Phys; 1992; 19(5):1191-4. PubMed ID: 1435597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of a simple method for reconstructing asymmetrically sampled echo data. Mugler JP; Brookeman JR J Magn Reson Imaging; 1991; 1(4):487-91. PubMed ID: 1790372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Analysis of noise in phase contrast MR imaging. Andersen AH; Kirsch JE Med Phys; 1996 Jun; 23(6):857-69. PubMed ID: 8798171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Signal-to-noise ratio and section thickness in two-dimensional versus three-dimensional Fourier transform MR imaging. Carlson J; Crooks L; Ortendahl D; Kramer DM; Kaufman L Radiology; 1988 Jan; 166(1 Pt 1):266-70. PubMed ID: 3336691 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Noise and artifact comparison for Fourier and polynomial phase correction used with Fourier reconstruction of asymmetric data sets. Hua J; Hurst GC J Magn Reson Imaging; 1992; 2(3):347-53. PubMed ID: 1627871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reduced MR acquisition time with the CROCUS technique. Ehrhardt JC; Tian ZC; Chang W J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1988; 12(3):468-73. PubMed ID: 3366964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Noise measurement from magnitude MRI using local estimates of variance and skewness. Rajan J; Poot D; Juntu J; Sijbers J Phys Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 55(16):N441-9. PubMed ID: 20679694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Magnetic resonance imaging and the reduction of motion artifacts: review of the principles. Van de Walle R; Lemahieu I; Achten E Technol Health Care; 1997 Dec; 5(6):419-35. PubMed ID: 9696161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of multichannel combination, parallel imaging and other reconstruction techniques on MRI noise characteristics. Dietrich O; Raya JG; Reeder SB; Ingrisch M; Reiser MF; Schoenberg SO Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Jul; 26(6):754-62. PubMed ID: 18440746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Adaptive anisotropic noise filtering for magnitude MR data. Sijbers J; den Dekker AJ; Van der Linden A; Verhoye TM; Van Dyck D Magn Reson Imaging; 1999 Dec; 17(10):1533-9. PubMed ID: 10610003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of constant frequency noise in magnetic resonance imaging with nonuniform k-space sampling. Du W; Karczmar GS; Pan X Med Phys; 2002 Aug; 29(8):1832-8. PubMed ID: 12201430 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled imaging of the liver: pulse sequence optimization and comparison with spin-echo MR imaging. Low RN; Francis IR; Herfkens RJ; Jeffrey RB; Glazer GM; Foo TK; Shimakawa A; Pelc NJ AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Mar; 160(3):501-9. PubMed ID: 8381572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An unbiased signal-to-noise ratio measure for magnetic resonance images. McGibney G; Smith MR Med Phys; 1993; 20(4):1077-8. PubMed ID: 8413015 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]