These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1435612)
1. Evaluation of the buildup effect of an 192Ir high dose-rate brachytherapy source. Park HC; Almond PR Med Phys; 1992; 19(5):1293-7. PubMed ID: 1435612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Measurements and calculations of the absorbed dose distribution around a 60Co source. Tiourina TB; Dries WJ; van der Linden PM Med Phys; 1995 May; 22(5):549-54. PubMed ID: 7643790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Monte Carlo dosimetry of the microselectron HDR 192Ir brachytherapy source using MCNP4A. Wallace S; Wong T; Fernando W Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1998 Mar; 21(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 9633148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A dosimetric comparison of 169Yb and 192Ir for HDR brachytherapy of the breast, accounting for the effect of finite patient dimensions and tissue inhomogeneities. Lymperopoulou G; Papagiannis P; Angelopoulos A; Karaiskos P; Georgiou E; Baltas D Med Phys; 2006 Dec; 33(12):4583-9. PubMed ID: 17278810 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Monte Carlo calculations of the ionization chamber wall correction factors for 192Ir and 60Co gamma rays and 250 kV x-rays for use in calibration of 192Ir HDR brachytherapy sources. Ferreira IH; de Almeida CE; Marre D; Marechal MH; Bridier A; Chavaudra J Phys Med Biol; 1999 Aug; 44(8):1897-904. PubMed ID: 10473203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Air-kerma strength determination of an HDR Smith BR; Micka JA; Aima M; DeWerd LA; Culberson WS Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 44(1):311-320. PubMed ID: 28102953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Determination of absorbed dose in water at the reference point d(r0, theta0) for an 192Ir HDR brachytherapy source using a Fricke system. Austerlitz C; Mota HC; Sempau J; Benhabib SM; Campos D; Allison R; DeAlmeida CE; Zhu D; Sibata CH Med Phys; 2008 Dec; 35(12):5360-5. PubMed ID: 19175095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Experimental derivation of wall correction factors for ionization chambers used in high dose rate 192Ir source calibration. Maréchal MH; de Almeida CE; Ferreira IH; Sibata CH Med Phys; 2002 Jan; 29(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 11833542 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy assessment of the superposition principle for evaluating dose distributions of elongated and curved 103Pd and 192Ir brachytherapy sources. Bannon EA; Yang Y; Rivard MJ Med Phys; 2011 Jun; 38(6):2957-63. PubMed ID: 21815369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Monte Carlo aided dosimetry of the microselectron pulsed and high dose-rate 192Ir sources. Williamson JF; Li Z Med Phys; 1995 Jun; 22(6):809-19. PubMed ID: 7565372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Determination of air-kerma strength for the 192Ir GammaMedplus iX pulsed-dose-rate brachytherapy source. Riley AD; Pike TL; Micka JA; Fulkerson RK; DeWerd LA Med Phys; 2013 Jul; 40(7):071732. PubMed ID: 23822436 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Monte Carlo study of verification imaging in high dose rate brachytherapy. Sheikh-Bagheri D; Munro P Med Phys; 1998 Apr; 25(4):404-14. PubMed ID: 9571606 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Study of encapsulated 170Tm sources for their potential use in brachytherapy. Ballester F; Granero D; Perez-Calatayud J; Venselaar JL; Rivard MJ Med Phys; 2010 Apr; 37(4):1629-37. PubMed ID: 20443484 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The dose distribution close to an 192Ir wire source: EGS4 Monte Carlo calculations. Cheung YC; Yu PK; Young EC; Chan CL; Ng MF; Tang F Phys Med Biol; 1997 Feb; 42(2):401-6. PubMed ID: 9044421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of radiation shielding requirements for HDR brachytherapy using 169Yb and 192Ir sources. Lymperopoulou G; Papagiannis P; Sakelliou L; Georgiou E; Hourdakis CJ; Baltas D Med Phys; 2006 Jul; 33(7):2541-7. PubMed ID: 16898458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dosimetry on transverse axes of 125I and 192Ir interstitial brachytherapy sources. Nath R; Meigooni AS; Meli JA Med Phys; 1990; 17(6):1032-40. PubMed ID: 2280732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dosimetric characterization of an 192Ir brachytherapy source with the Monte Carlo code PENELOPE. Casado FJ; García-Pareja S; Cenizo E; Mateo B; Bodineau C; Galán P Phys Med; 2010; 26(3):132-9. PubMed ID: 20034828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Monte Carlo calculated dose distribution for endovascular HDR brachytherapy with Ir-192. Dries WJ Radiother Oncol; 1997 Oct; 45(1):77-82. PubMed ID: 9364635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of organ doses for patients undergoing balloon brachytherapy of the breast with HDR 192Ir or electronic sources using monte carlo simulations in a heterogeneous human phantom. Mille MM; Xu XG; Rivard MJ Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):662-71. PubMed ID: 20229875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A dosimetric comparison of 169Yb versus 192Ir for HDR prostate brachytherapy. Lymperopoulou G; Papagiannis P; Sakelliou L; Milickovic N; Giannouli S; Baltas D Med Phys; 2005 Dec; 32(12):3832-42. PubMed ID: 16475783 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]