These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1435627)

  • 21. The human rights impact of gender stereotyping in the context of reproductive health care.
    O'Connell C; Zampas C
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2019 Jan; 144(1):116-121. PubMed ID: 30311945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Morgentaler v. The Queen in the Supreme Court of Canada.
    Martin SL
    Can J Women Law; 1987-1988; 2(2):422-31. PubMed ID: 17076040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. U.S. Supreme Court agrees to hear fetal protection employment policy.
    Michel SE
    Occup Health Saf; 1990 Jul; 59(7):40-1. PubMed ID: 2388739
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Employment law--Title VII--Eighth Circuit holds that benefits plans excluding all contraceptives do not discriminate based on sex.--In re Union Pacific Railroad Employment Practices Litigation, 479 F.3d 936 (8th Cir. 2007), reh'g and reh'g en banc denied, No. 06-1706 (8th Cir. May 23, 2007).
    Harv Law Rev; 2008 Mar; 121(5):1447-54. PubMed ID: 18441613
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Johnson Controls, Inc. v. California Fair Employment and Housing Commission.
    California. Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Division 3
    Wests Calif Report; 1990 Feb; 267():158-78. PubMed ID: 11648150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A labor perspective on workplace reproductive hazards: past history, current concerns, and positive directions.
    Graham T; Lessin N; Mirer F
    Environ Health Perspect; 1993 Jul; 101 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):199-204. PubMed ID: 8243392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Gender matters: implications for clinical research and women's health care.
    Rothenberg KH
    Houst Law Rev; 1996 Symposium; 32(5):1201-72. PubMed ID: 11660524
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. International Union v. Johnson Controls, Inc., 24 February 1988.
    United States. District Court, Eastern District of Wisconsin
    Annu Rev Popul Law; 1988; 15():173. PubMed ID: 12289313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Prenatal v. parental rights: what a difference an "a" makes.
    Gallagher A
    St Marys Law J; 1989; 21(2):301-24. PubMed ID: 16100799
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Envisioning a future for reproductive liberty: strategies for making the rights real.
    Pine RN; Law SA
    Harv Civ Rights-Civil Lib Law Rev; 1992; 27(2):407-63. PubMed ID: 11656200
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Marital secrets. The emerging issue of abortion spousal notification laws.
    Shore BD
    J Leg Med; 1982 Sep; 3(3):461-82. PubMed ID: 6983551
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. International Union, UAW v. Johnson Controls, Inc. [26 September 1989].
    United States. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
    Annu Rev Popul Law; 1989; 16():148. PubMed ID: 12344152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The toxic workplace: Title VII protection for the potentially pregnant person.
    Andrade VM
    Harv Womens Law J; 1981; 4(1):71-105. PubMed ID: 11649449
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Abortion and the consideration of fundamental, irreconcilable interests.
    Jones CJ
    Syracuse Law Rev; 1982; 33(2):565-613. PubMed ID: 11658668
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. What the Pregnancy Discrimination Act means for hospitals.
    Stickler KB
    Trustee; 1979 Nov; 32(11):15-9. PubMed ID: 10244446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Fetal protection update: the Supreme Court decision.
    Healthc Hazard Mater Manage; 1991 Jun; 4(9):9-10. PubMed ID: 10112450
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Supreme Court ruling may make women a little more equal.
    Schrader ES
    AORN J; 1981 Aug; 34(2):193-4. PubMed ID: 6912019
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Getting beyond discrimination: a regulatory solution to the problem of fetal hazards in the workplace.
    Buss E
    Yale Law J; 1986 Jan; 95(3):577-98. PubMed ID: 11658700
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Shared interests: promoting healthy births without sacrificing women's liberty.
    Johnsen D
    Hastings Law J; 1992 Mar; 43(3):569-614. PubMed ID: 11652106
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. How technology is reframing the abortion debate.
    Callahan D
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1986 Feb; 16(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 3514547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.