These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1436072)
21. Congress slashes "silly titles". Anderson C Nature; 1992 May; 357(6376):271. PubMed ID: 1589030 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Research funding. Politics and funding in the U.S. public biomedical R&D system. Hegde D; Mowery DC Science; 2008 Dec; 322(5909):1797-8. PubMed ID: 19095928 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Bush favors boosting AIDS research, but other funding static. AIDS Policy Law; 2002 Feb; 17(3):1, 4. PubMed ID: 11873552 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Future of AIDS research office threatened. Appel A Nature; 1995 Jul; 376(6537):205-6. PubMed ID: 7617022 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. HIV/AIDS: money matters. Roberts L; Jasny B Science; 2008 Jul; 321(5888):511. PubMed ID: 18653875 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. NCI AIDS budget under microscope. Science; 1995 Dec; 270(5242):1559. PubMed ID: 7502058 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Biomedical research. Stimulus funding elicits a tidal wave of 'challenge grants'. Kaiser J Science; 2009 May; 324(5929):867. PubMed ID: 19443754 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. AIDS appropriations measures deferred for Congressional recess. AIDS Policy Law; 1996 Aug; 11(14):3. PubMed ID: 11363680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Perspectives. Researchers protest congressional "meddling". Kent C Faulkner Grays Med Health; 1992 Nov; 46(45):suppl 4 p.. PubMed ID: 10121800 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Peer review of researchgrant applications at the National Institutes of Health 2: review by an initial review group. Henley C Fed Proc; 1977 Aug; 36(9):2186-90. PubMed ID: 885260 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparability of the American Cancer Society and National Institutes of Health peer review systems. Vivona S; Do van Quy D Cancer Res; 1973 Apr; 33(4):919. PubMed ID: 4739656 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Panel calls for overhaul of AIDS research. Wadman M Nature; 1996 Mar; 380(6571):190. PubMed ID: 8637561 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. NIH bucks political trend to win increased funds from Congress. Wadman M Nature; 1996 Jun; 381(6584):633. PubMed ID: 8649498 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. US societies unite in plea for boost to research budgets. Brumfiel G Nature; 2003 Jan; 421(6919):100. PubMed ID: 12520265 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. AIDS research funding. Budget division disputed. Concar D Nature; 1990 Apr; 344(6269):803. PubMed ID: 2330036 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Proposals for improving the Peer Review System of the National Institutes of Health. Kirschstein RL Clin Res; 1977 Dec; 25(5):295-6. PubMed ID: 10304717 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparative effectiveness casts first shadows across US industry. Waltz E Nat Biotechnol; 2009 Mar; 27(3):211-2. PubMed ID: 19270651 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Letter: The National Institutes of Health grants peer review study team. Looney GL Am J Chin Med (Gard City N Y); 1976; 4(2):201-3. PubMed ID: 937242 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]