These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. How to quantify binaural hearing in patients with unilateral hearing using hearing implants. Snik A; Agterberg M; Bosman A Audiol Neurootol; 2015; 20 Suppl 1():44-7. PubMed ID: 25997479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of conductive hearing loss and middle ear surgery on binaural hearing. Hall JW; Derlacki EL Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1986; 95(5 Pt 1):525-30. PubMed ID: 3767223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Tests for determining hearing impairment and disability; analysis of pure tone and speech tests for clinical and compensation purposes. FOWLER EP J Am Med Assoc; 1952 Oct; 150(7):678-83. PubMed ID: 12980821 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Binaural loudness summation in the hearing impaired. Hawkins DB; Prosek RA; Walden BE; Montgomery AA J Speech Hear Res; 1987 Mar; 30(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 3560897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Consequences of Early Conductive Hearing Loss on Long-Term Binaural Processing. Graydon K; Rance G; Dowell R; Van Dun B Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):621-627. PubMed ID: 28353521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Binaural advantages in using a cochlear implant for adults with profound unilateral hearing loss. Lorens A; KruszyĆska M; Obrycka A; Skarzynski PH; Wilson B; Skarzynski H Acta Otolaryngol; 2019 Feb; 139(2):153-161. PubMed ID: 30762466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Time resolution ability in dichotic hearing experiments (author's transl)]. von Wedel H Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1979; 222(2):133-44. PubMed ID: 435165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Conditioned reflexes as a method of objective determination of deafness and acuity of hearing]. KHAITUN SE Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1953; 15(4):76. PubMed ID: 13090566 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A new formula for using the audiogram to predict speech hearing loss. HARRIS JD; HAINES HL; MYERS CK AMA Arch Otolaryngol; 1956 Feb; 63(2):158-76. PubMed ID: 13282566 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Binaural pitch perception in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. Santurette S; Dau T Hear Res; 2007 Jan; 223(1-2):29-47. PubMed ID: 17107767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The validity of tuning fork tests in diagnosing hearing loss. Miltenburg DM J Otolaryngol; 1994 Aug; 23(4):254-9. PubMed ID: 7996624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Problems in the identification of non-organic hearing loss. LARR AL; LEAMER BV Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1957 Mar; 66(1):182-6. PubMed ID: 13411992 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Compensation of hearing loss after charging the ear with a pure sound]. BIRECKI W; IWANKIEWICZ S; JANKOWSKI W; ZIEMSKI Z Otolaryngol Pol; 1956; 10(2):145-8. PubMed ID: 13388394 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Estimation of percentage of reduced hearing loss and disability caused by hearing defects]. PALVA T Suom Laakaril; 1953 Jan; 8(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 13049043 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The relation between hearing loss for specific frequencies and the distance at which speech can be identified. CURRY ET Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1949 Mar; 58(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 18128064 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]