These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14361482)
61. Noise-induced hearing loss. McReynolds MC Air Med J; 2005; 24(2):73-8. PubMed ID: 15741953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Newborn hearing screening in a South African private health care hospital. Swanepoel D; Ebrahim S; Joseph A; Friedland PL Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2007 Jun; 71(6):881-7. PubMed ID: 17382410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. The everyday hearing protection program. Johnson LF Occup Health Saf; 2006 Apr; 75(4):32, 34-6. PubMed ID: 16642675 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
64. An eye conservation program for large and small industry. GANSCHOW JH J Iowa State Med Soc; 1959 Aug; 49(8):505-9. PubMed ID: 13673211 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
65. Eye conservation program in industry. GANSCHOW JH Ind Med Surg; 1957 Sep; 26(9):405-8. PubMed ID: 13462588 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
66. Universal neonatal hearing screening: applications for a developing country in the Asia-Pacific region. Navarro-Locsin CG Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health; 2003; 34 Suppl 3():227-8. PubMed ID: 15906741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Application of Prevention through Design for hearing loss in the mining industry. Kovalchik PG; Matetic RJ; Smith AK; Bealko SB J Safety Res; 2008; 39(2):251-4. PubMed ID: 18454977 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. [The influence of aviation noise on the hearing organ in engineering-and-technical staff of Air Forces]. Ushakov IB; Romasiuk SI; Sheshegov PM; Zinkin VN; Soldatov SK; Shishov AA Voen Med Zh; 2006 Jul; 327(7):59-62. PubMed ID: 16977885 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
69. Newborn hearing screening. An assessment of knowledge, attitudes, and practice among Minnesota physicians. Brown NC; James K; Liu J; Hatcher PA; Li Y Minn Med; 2006 Dec; 89(12):50-4. PubMed ID: 17256385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Outcome measurement for patients receiving hearing aid services. Cook JA; Hawkins DB Laryngoscope; 2007 Apr; 117(4):610-3. PubMed ID: 17415130 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. [Comparative analysis of occupational hearing loss risk among private farmers with reference to decision-making criteria contained in the cabinet ordinances (current and previous)]. Solecki L Med Pr; 2005; 56(6):451-60. PubMed ID: 16613370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Psychosomatic status affects the relationship between subjective hearing difficulties and the results of audiometry. Hashimoto H; Nomura K; Yano E J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Apr; 57(4):381-5. PubMed ID: 15135839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. [Priority in occupational health in the USL 10 area of Florence]. Fiumalbi C; Mechi MT; Petrioli G; Cupelli V; Arcangeli G G Ital Med Lav Ergon; 2003; 25 Suppl(3):157-8. PubMed ID: 14979128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Noise-induced hearing loss and hearing conservation in mining. McBride DI Occup Med (Lond); 2004 Aug; 54(5):290-6. PubMed ID: 15289584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Occupational hearing loss. FOX MS Ind Med Surg; 1958 Jan; 27(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 13491119 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
78. The Oklahoma conservation of hearing program. KEYS JW; MILLIER RL J Okla State Med Assoc; 1953 Dec; 46(12):335-9. PubMed ID: 13109606 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
79. A hearing conservation program. DAVIDSON LE Am J Nurs; 1955 May; 55(5):582-3. PubMed ID: 14361482 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
80. The otologist's role in the industrial hearing conservation program. FOX MS Laryngoscope; 1954 Feb; 64(2):79-88. PubMed ID: 13131889 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]