These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1437069)

  • 1. Direct digital radiography for the detection of periodontal bone lesions.
    Furkart AJ; Dove SB; McDavid WD; Nummikoski P; Matteson S
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1992 Nov; 74(5):652-60. PubMed ID: 1437069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. 6-bit and 8-bit digital radiography for detecting simulated periodontal lesions.
    Pass B; Furkart AJ; Dove SB; McDavid WD; Gregson PH
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Apr; 77(4):406-11. PubMed ID: 8015807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Diagnostic accuracy of direct digital dental radiography for the detection of periapical bone lesions: overall comparison between conventional and direct digital radiography.
    Kullendorff B; Nilsson M; Rohlin M
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1996 Sep; 82(3):344-50. PubMed ID: 8884837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of zoomed digital image in the detection of periodontal bone defect: in vitro study.
    de Morais JA; Sakakura CE; Loffredo LC; Scaf G
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 May; 35(3):139-42. PubMed ID: 16618844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Direct digital radiography for the detection of periapical bone lesions: a clinical study.
    Kullendorff B; Petersson K; Rohlin M
    Endod Dent Traumatol; 1997 Aug; 13(4):183-9. PubMed ID: 9550045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In vitro comparison of D- and E-speed film radiography, RVG, and visualix digital radiography for the detection of enamel approximal and dentinal occlusal caries lesions.
    Hintze H; Wenzel A; Jones C
    Caries Res; 1994; 28(5):363-7. PubMed ID: 8001059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy in detecting bone lesions in vitro with conventional and subtracted direct digital imaging.
    Stassinakis A; Brägger U; Stojanovic M; Bürgin W; Lussi A; Lang NP
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Nov; 24(4):232-7. PubMed ID: 9161167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [The diagnosis of bone lesions with conventional x-ray images and with a direct digital procedure (RVG). An in-vitro study. RadioVisioGraphy].
    Stassinakis A; Zeyer O; Brägger U
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 1995; 105(12):1539-45. PubMed ID: 8553039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of direct digital and conventional radiography for the detection of proximal surface caries in the mixed dentition.
    Uprichard KK; Potter BJ; Russell CM; Schafer TE; Adair S; Weller RN
    Pediatr Dent; 2000; 22(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 10730280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of high-resolution cone beam computed tomography in the detection of simulated interradicular bone lesions.
    Noujeim M; Prihoda T; Langlais R; Nummikoski P
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Mar; 38(3):156-62. PubMed ID: 19225086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of conventional and TACT (Tuned Aperture Computed Tomography) digital subtraction radiography in detection of pericrestal bone-gain.
    Chai-U-Dom O; Ludlow JB; Tyndall DA; Webber RL
    J Periodontal Res; 2002 Apr; 37(2):147-53. PubMed ID: 12009184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical validation of a new subtraction radiography technique for periodontal bone loss detection.
    Nummikoski PV; Steffensen B; Hamilton K; Dove SB
    J Periodontol; 2000 Apr; 71(4):598-605. PubMed ID: 10807124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of digital imaging by using CCD and CMOS-APS sensors with E-speed film in the detection of periapical bony lesions.
    Paurazas SB; Geist JR; Pink FE; Hoen MM; Steiman HR
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2000 Mar; 89(3):356-62. PubMed ID: 10710463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Tuned-aperture computed tomography for detection of induced mid-buccal/lingual alveolar bone defects.
    Nair MK; Bezik J
    J Periodontol; 2006 Nov; 77(11):1833-8. PubMed ID: 17076608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of two imaging modalities: F-speed film and digital images for detection of osseous defects in patients with interdental vertical bone defects.
    Jorgenson T; Masood F; Beckerley JM; Burgin C; Parker DE
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Dec; 36(8):500-5. PubMed ID: 18033948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Periodontal disease morbidity quantification. II. Validation of alveolar bone loss measurements and vertical defect diagnosis from digital bite-wing images.
    Hildebolt CF; Vannier MW; Shrout MK; Pilgram TK; Province M; Vahey EP; Rietz DW
    J Periodontol; 1990 Oct; 61(10):623-32. PubMed ID: 2231229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interpretation of chemically created lesions using direct digital imaging.
    Tirrell BC; Miles DA; Brown CE; Legan JJ
    J Endod; 1996 Feb; 22(2):74-8. PubMed ID: 8935022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of panoramic radiography and panoramic digital subtraction radiography in the detection of simulated osteophytic lesions of the mandibular condyle.
    Masood F; Katz JO; Hardman PK; Glaros AG; Spencer P
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2002 May; 93(5):626-31. PubMed ID: 12075216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of methods to assess marginal bone height around endosseous implants.
    Meijer HJ; Steen WH; Bosman F
    J Clin Periodontol; 1993 Apr; 20(4):250-3. PubMed ID: 8473534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Diagnostic accuracy of direct digital dental radiography for the detection of periapical bone lesions. II. Effects on diagnostic accuracy after application of image processing.
    Kullendorff B; Nilsson M
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1996 Nov; 82(5):585-9. PubMed ID: 8936525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.