These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1437478)

  • 1. Salience of stimulus and response features in choice-reaction tasks.
    Reeve TG; Proctor RW; Weeks DJ; Dornier L
    Percept Psychophys; 1992 Oct; 52(4):453-60. PubMed ID: 1437478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The acquisition of task-specific productions and modifications of declarative representations in spatial-precuing tasks.
    Proctor RW; Reeve TG
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1988 Jun; 117(2):182-96. PubMed ID: 2969034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Planning keypress and reaching responses: effects of response location and number of potential effectors.
    Adam JJ; Taminiau B; van Veen N; Ament B; Rijcken JM; Meijer K; Pratt J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Dec; 34(6):1464-78. PubMed ID: 19045986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Task-set inertia and memory-consolidation bottleneck in dual tasks.
    Koch I; Rumiati RI
    Psychol Res; 2006 Nov; 70(6):448-58. PubMed ID: 16215746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Determinants of the benefit for consistent stimulus-response mappings in dual-task performance of four-choice tasks.
    Proctor RW; Vu KP
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 May; 71(4):734-56. PubMed ID: 19429956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Age differences in response selection for pure and mixed stimulus-response mappings and tasks.
    Vu KP; Proctor RW
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Sep; 129(1):49-60. PubMed ID: 18541219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Orthogonal cross-task compatibility: abstract spatial coding in dual tasks.
    Koch I; Joucoeur P
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2007 Feb; 14(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 17546730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Determinants of the benefit for consistent spatial mappings in dual-task performance of three-choice tasks.
    Proctor RW; Vu KP
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Nov; 71(8):1771-81. PubMed ID: 19933561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The prevalence effect in two-dimensional stimulus-response compatibility is a function of the relative salience of the dimensions.
    Vu KP; Proctor RW
    Percept Psychophys; 2002 Jul; 64(5):815-28. PubMed ID: 12201340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Increased spatial salience in the social Simon task: a response-coding account of spatial compatibility effects.
    Dittrich K; Rothe A; Klauer KC
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Jul; 74(5):911-29. PubMed ID: 22528612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Stimulus-response correspondence in go-nogo and choice tasks: Are reactions altered by the presence of an irrelevant salient object?
    Lien MC; Pedersen L; Proctor RW
    Psychol Res; 2016 Nov; 80(6):912-934. PubMed ID: 26318437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of auditory stimulus intensity on response force in simple, go/no-go, and choice RT tasks.
    Miller J; Franz V; Ulrich R
    Percept Psychophys; 1999 Jan; 61(1):107-19. PubMed ID: 10070203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cross-modal compatibility effects with visual-spatial and auditory-verbal stimulus and response sets.
    Proctor RW; Dutta A; Kelly PL; Weeks DJ
    Percept Psychophys; 1994 Jan; 55(1):42-7. PubMed ID: 8036092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Emergent perceptual features in the benefit of consistent stimulus-response mappings on dual-task performance.
    Vu KP; Proctor RW
    Psychol Res; 2006 Nov; 70(6):468-83. PubMed ID: 16215745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Endogenous visuospatial precuing effects as a function of age and task demands.
    Tellinghuisen DJ; Zimba LD; Robin DA
    Percept Psychophys; 1996 Aug; 58(6):947-58. PubMed ID: 8768189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Attentional capture is contingent on the interaction between task demand and stimulus salience.
    Lu S; Han S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Jul; 71(5):1015-26. PubMed ID: 19525534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Time course of the Simon effect in pointing movements for horizontal, vertical, and acoustic stimuli: evidence for a common mechanism.
    Buetti S; Kerzel D
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Nov; 129(3):420-8. PubMed ID: 18930170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Time course of perceptual grouping.
    Kurylo DD
    Percept Psychophys; 1997 Jan; 59(1):142-7. PubMed ID: 9038416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Simon congruency effects based on stimulus and response numerosity.
    Miller J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Feb; 59(2):387-96. PubMed ID: 16618641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dissociating visual attention and effector selection in spatial precuing tasks.
    Adam JJ; Pratt J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Dec; 30(6):1092-106. PubMed ID: 15584817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.