These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1437478)

  • 21. Subliminal Gestalt grouping: evidence of perceptual grouping by proximity and similarity in absence of conscious perception.
    Montoro PR; Luna D; Ortells JJ
    Conscious Cogn; 2014 Apr; 25():1-8. PubMed ID: 24518805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Differential effects of visual-spatial attention on response latency and temporal-order judgment.
    Neumann O; Esselmann U; Klotz W
    Psychol Res; 1993; 56(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 8310102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. On the relation between stimulus intensity and processing time: Piéron's law and choice reaction time.
    Pins D; Bonnet C
    Percept Psychophys; 1996 Apr; 58(3):390-400. PubMed ID: 8935900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Visual attention and perceptual grouping.
    Ben-Av MB; Sagi D; Braun J
    Percept Psychophys; 1992 Sep; 52(3):277-94. PubMed ID: 1408639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Choice and response time processes in the identification and categorization of unidimensional stimuli.
    Lacouture Y; Marley AA
    Percept Psychophys; 2004 Oct; 66(7):1206-26. PubMed ID: 15751477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. How much attention does an event file need?
    Hommel B
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Oct; 31(5):1067-82. PubMed ID: 16262499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Attentional bias toward low-intensity stimuli: an explanation for the intensity dissociation between reaction time and temporal order judgment?
    Jaśkowski P; Verleger R
    Conscious Cogn; 2000 Sep; 9(3):435-56. PubMed ID: 10993668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Stimulus-response compatibility between stimulated eye and response location: implications for attentional accounts of the Simon effect.
    Valle-Inclán F; Hackley SA; De Labra C
    Psychol Res; 2003 Nov; 67(4):240-3. PubMed ID: 12761624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Grouping and emergent features in vision: toward a theory of basic Gestalts.
    Pomerantz JR; Portillo MC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Oct; 37(5):1331-49. PubMed ID: 21728463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Where similarity beats redundancy: the importance of context, higher order similarity, and response assignment.
    Eidels A; Townsend JT; Pomerantz JR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Dec; 34(6):1441-63. PubMed ID: 19045985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Task-irrelevant stimulus salience affects visual search.
    Lamy D; Zoaris L
    Vision Res; 2009 May; 49(11):1472-80. PubMed ID: 19289140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Spatial mislocalization as a consequence of sequential coding of stimuli.
    Priess HW; Scharlau I; Becker SI; Ansorge U
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Feb; 74(2):365-78. PubMed ID: 22090187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Focal visual attention and pattern discrimination.
    Saarinen J
    Perception; 1993; 22(5):509-15. PubMed ID: 8414877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Factors limiting large-scale localisation.
    Sterken Y; Toet A; Yap YL
    Perception; 1994; 23(6):709-26. PubMed ID: 7845763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Translating between orthogonally oriented stimulus and response arrays in four-choice reaction tasks.
    Proctor RW; Reeve TG; Weeks DJ; Campbell KC; Dornier L
    Can J Exp Psychol; 1997 Jun; 51(2):85-98. PubMed ID: 9340077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Precueing spatial S-R correspondence: is there regulation of expected response conflict?
    Wühr P; Kunde W
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Aug; 34(4):872-83. PubMed ID: 18665732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Dissociation of S-R compatibility and Simon effects with mixed tasks and mappings.
    Proctor RW; Yamaguchi M; Dutt V; Gonzalez C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Apr; 39(2):593-609. PubMed ID: 22963231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Space, object, and task selection.
    Lachter J; Remington RW; Ruthruff E
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Jul; 71(5):995-1014. PubMed ID: 19525533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Mental transformations of spatial stimuli in humans and in monkeys: rotation vs. translocation.
    Nekovarova T; Nedvidek J; Klement D; Rokyta R; Bures J
    Behav Brain Res; 2013 Mar; 240():182-91. PubMed ID: 23174207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effects of stimulus features and instruction on response coding, selection, and inhibition: evidence from repetition effects under task switching.
    Druey MD; Hübner R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Oct; 61(10):1573-600. PubMed ID: 18777444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.