These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1437622)

  • 1. The right of refusal?
    Kargar I
    Nurs Times; 1992 Nov 4-10; 88(45):23. PubMed ID: 1437622
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. High Court endorses women's right to refuse treatment.
    Pract Midwife; 1998 Jun; 1(6):7. PubMed ID: 9735814
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. When pregnant women and their physicians disagree on the need for cesarean section: no simple solution.
    Catlin AJ
    Adv Pract Nurs Q; 1998; 4(2):23-9. PubMed ID: 9874946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The rights of pregnant patients: Carder case brings bold policy initiatives.
    Thornton TE; Paltrow L
    Healthspan; 1991 May; 8(5):10-6. PubMed ID: 10111987
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A case of fetal rights. Massachusetts mandates pregnancy care.
    Cannon A
    US News World Rep; 2000 Sep; 129(12):31. PubMed ID: 11183311
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Refusal of invasive obstetrical intervention and the patient's right law].
    Peleg D; Ben-Rafael Z
    Harefuah; 1997 Jul; 133(1-2):50-1. PubMed ID: 9332060
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The right to say no.
    Ferguson P
    Nurs Times; 1998 Jun 10-16; 94(23):28-30. PubMed ID: 9687749
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Irrational and pregnant.
    Mahowald MB
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1992; 22(3):45. PubMed ID: 1612887
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Jehovah's Witnesses and the refusal of blood.
    Ridley DT
    J Clin Ethics; 1990; 1(3):254-7. PubMed ID: 2132022
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Maternal-fetal conflict: positions and principles.
    Mahowald MB
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Dec; 35(4):729-37. PubMed ID: 1451356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Forced medical treatment in pregnancy: resolving the conflicting rights of mother and fetus.
    Meyer KC
    Med Staff Couns; 1990; 4(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 10104769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. What happened to the midwife in the case of the woman forced to have a caesarean.
    Cronk M
    Nurs Times; 1998 May 20-26; 94(20):18. PubMed ID: 9661457
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Worst case scenario. Supporting women who refuse a caesarean section.
    Lee G
    Pract Midwife; 1998; 1(7-8):28-9. PubMed ID: 10392145
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The right to choose.
    Savage W
    Nurs Stand; 1998 May 20-26; 12(35):14. PubMed ID: 9687689
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The right of the patient to refuse medical care.
    Neoral L
    Acta Med Leg Soc (Liege); 1988; 38(2):75-9. PubMed ID: 2979490
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Compulsory caesareans: the last world?
    Dimond B
    Pract Midwife; 1998 Jun; 1(6):10-2. PubMed ID: 9735815
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Refusal of blood transfusion for religious reasons].
    Ulsenheimer K
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1994 Jun; 54(6):M83-6. PubMed ID: 8088483
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Personal autonomy versus active management of labor.
    McLean MT
    Midwifery Today Childbirth Educ; 1994; (30):18. PubMed ID: 7920795
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Compulsory Caesarean sections: an English perspective.
    Francis R
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1998; 14(2):365-89. PubMed ID: 9693485
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mental incapacity and consent to treatment. Who gives the go-ahead?
    Allison G
    Health Serv J; 1997 May; 107(5554):suppl 11-2. PubMed ID: 10168214
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.