311 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1437685)
21. Effect of thermal and mechanical load cycling on the marginal integrity of Class II resin composite restorations.
Davidson CL; Abdalla AI
Am J Dent; 1993 Feb; 6(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 8329161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Liner and light exposure: effect on in-vitro Class V microleakage.
Svizero Nda R; D'Alpino PH; da Silva e Souza MH; de Carvalho RM
Oper Dent; 2005; 30(3):325-30. PubMed ID: 15986952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Influence of flowable liner and margin location on microleakage of conventional and packable class II resin composites.
Tredwin CJ; Stokes A; Moles DR
Oper Dent; 2005; 30(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 15765955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Factors associated with clinical success of cervical abrasion/erosion restorations.
Powell LV; Johnson GH; Gordon GE
Oper Dent; 1995; 20(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 8700767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. SEM and microleakage evaluation of the marginal integrity of two types of class V restorations with or without the use of a light-curable coating material and of polishing.
Magni E; Zhang L; Hickel R; Bossù M; Polimeni A; Ferrari M
J Dent; 2008 Nov; 36(11):885-91. PubMed ID: 18757129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Marginal leakage around V-shaped cavities restored with glass-ionomer cements: an in vitro study.
Zyskind D; Frenkel A; Fuks A; Hirschfeld Z
Quintessence Int; 1991 Jan; 22(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 1838417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. In vitro marginal leakage around Class II resin composite restorations with glass-ceramic inserts.
Coli P; Derhami K; Brännström M
Quintessence Int; 1997 Nov; 28(11):755-60. PubMed ID: 9573868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Microleakage and marginal gap formation of glass ionomer resin restorations.
Salama FS; Riad MI; Abdel Megid FY
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1995; 20(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 8634192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Gingival microleakage of Class II resin composite restorations with fiber inserts.
El-Mowafy O; El-Badrawy W; Eltanty A; Abbasi K; Habib N
Oper Dent; 2007; 32(3):298-305. PubMed ID: 17555183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Coronal microleakage in conservatively restored endodontic access preparations.
Kleitches AJ; Lemon RR; Jeansonne BG
J Tenn Dent Assoc; 1995 Jan; 75(1):31-4. PubMed ID: 9520778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Marginal adaptation of composite restorations versus hybrid ionomer/composite sandwich restorations.
Friedl KH; Schmalz G; Hiller KA; Mortazavi F
Oper Dent; 1997; 22(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 9227124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Microleakage in the sandwich technique.
Mount GJ; Papageorgiou A; Makinson OF
Am J Dent; 1992 Aug; 5(4):195-8. PubMed ID: 1290608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. In vitro microleakage associated with posterior composite restorations used with different base/bonding system combinations.
Youngson CC; Grey NJ; Jones JG; Redfern E
Dent Mater; 1991 Oct; 7(4):240-6. PubMed ID: 1814770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Microleakage of class 2 Superbond-lined composite restorations with and without a cervical amalgam base.
Hovav S; Holan G; Lewinstein I; Fuks AB
Oper Dent; 1995; 20(2):63-7. PubMed ID: 8700773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Leakage patterns associated with glass-ionomer-based resin restorations.
Wieczkowski G; Joynt RB; Davis EL; Yu XY; Cleary K
Oper Dent; 1992; 17(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 1437682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Effect of thickness of flowable resins on marginal leakage in class II composite restorations.
Malmström HS; Schlueter M; Roach T; Moss ME
Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):373-80. PubMed ID: 12120775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Microleakage in Class II composite resin restorations].
Koliniotoy-Kubia E; Jacobsen PH
Odontostomatol Proodos; 1990 Jun; 44(3):187-93. PubMed ID: 2130331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Marginal leakage in class V composite resin restorations with glass ionomer liners in vitro.
Mathis RS; DeWald JP; Moody CR; Ferracane JL
J Prosthet Dent; 1990 May; 63(5):522-5. PubMed ID: 2338665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The effect of base/liner use on restoration leakage.
von Fraunhofer JA; Marshall KR; Holman BG
Gen Dent; 2006; 54(2):106-9. PubMed ID: 16689065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A comparative study of microleakage below cemento-enamel junction using light cure and chemically cured glass ionomer cement liners.
Gupta S; Khinda VI; Grewal N
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2002 Dec; 20(4):158-64. PubMed ID: 12587752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
