311 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1437685)
41. Reducing microleakage with the glass-ionomer/resin sandwich technique.
Schwartz JL; Anderson MH; Pelleu GB
Oper Dent; 1990; 15(5):186-92. PubMed ID: 2098728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Microleakage of amalgam restorations using dentin bonding system primers.
Berry FA; Parker SD; Rice D; Muñoz CA
Am J Dent; 1996 Aug; 9(4):174-8. PubMed ID: 9002794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Effects of the XR-bonding system on in vitro caries.
Swift EJ; Linden JJ; Wefel JS
Am J Dent; 1991 Aug; 4(4):157-61. PubMed ID: 1930838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Effect of two light-emitting diode (LED) and one halogen curing light on the microleakage of Class V flowable composite restorations.
Attar N; Korkmaz Y
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Feb; 8(2):80-8. PubMed ID: 17277830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Marginal sealing ability of three cervical restorative systems.
Yap AU; Lim CC; Neo JC
Quintessence Int; 1995 Nov; 26(11):817-20. PubMed ID: 8628842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Volumetric microleakage assessment of glass-ionomer-resin composite hybrid materials.
de Magalhães CS; Serra MC; Rodrigues Júnior AL
Quintessence Int; 1999 Feb; 30(2):117-21. PubMed ID: 10356563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Microleakage of Class V restorations using two different compomer systems: an in vitro study.
Estafan D; Pines MS; Erakin C; Fuerst PF
J Clin Dent; 1999; 10(4):124-6. PubMed ID: 10825860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Effects of total and selective bonding on marginal adaptation and microleakage of Class I resin composite restorations in vitro.
Schmidlin PR; Huber T; Göhring TN; Attin T; Bindl A
Oper Dent; 2008; 33(6):629-35. PubMed ID: 19051855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Influence of the restorative technique and new adhesives on the dentin marginal seal and adaptation of resin composite Class II restorations: an in vitro evaluation.
Dietschi D; De Siebenthal G; Neveu-Rosenstand L; Holz J
Quintessence Int; 1995 Oct; 26(10):717-27. PubMed ID: 8935115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Clinical comparison of Class V resin composite and glass ionomer restorations.
Powell LV; Gordon GE; Johnson GH
Am J Dent; 1992 Oct; 5(5):249-52. PubMed ID: 1299249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Reducing microleakage in Class II restorations: an in vitro study.
Crim GA; Chapman KW
Quintessence Int; 1994 Nov; 25(11):781-5. PubMed ID: 7568683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Microleakage of glass ionomer cement composite resin and glass ionomer resin cement.
Erdilek N; Ozata F; Sepetcioglu F
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1997; 21(4):311-4. PubMed ID: 9484117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Sealing capacity of a resin-modified glass-ionomer and resin composite placed in vivo in Class 5 restorations.
Ferrari M; Davidson CL
Oper Dent; 1996; 21(2):69-72. PubMed ID: 8957921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Microleakage of Gluma Bond, Scotchbond 2 and a glass ionomer/composite sandwich technique.
Reeves GW; Fitchie JG; Scarbrough AR; Hembree JH
Am J Dent; 1990 Oct; 3(5):195-8. PubMed ID: 2127533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Effect of two different restorative techniques using resin-based composites on microleakage.
Aranha AC; Pimenta LA
Am J Dent; 2004 Apr; 17(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 15151335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Sealing effectiveness of light-cured glass ionomer cement liners.
Sidhu SK
J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Dec; 68(6):891-4. PubMed ID: 1494114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Effect of occlusal load cycling on the marginal integrity of adhesive Class V restorations.
Davidson CL; Abdalla AI
Am J Dent; 1994 Apr; 7(2):111-4. PubMed ID: 8054183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Influence of different restorative techniques on microleakage in Class II cavities with gingival wall in cementum.
Demarco FF; Ramos OL; Mota CS; Formolo E; Justino LM
Oper Dent; 2001; 26(3):253-9. PubMed ID: 11357567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Early in vitro marginal microleakage associated with different lining materials under Class II amalgam restorations.
Youngson CC; Holguin SM
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1992 Dec; 1(2):73-7. PubMed ID: 1306739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Microleakage at the cervical margin of composite Class II cavities with different restorative techniques.
Beznos C
Oper Dent; 2001; 26(1):60-9. PubMed ID: 11203779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
