These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1438752)

  • 1. AMBER and conventional chest radiography: comparison of radiation dose and image quality.
    Geleijns J; Broerse JJ; Julius HW; Vrooman HA; Zoetelief J; Zweers D; Kool LJ
    Radiology; 1992 Dec; 185(3):719-23. PubMed ID: 1438752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. AMBER chest radiography and patient dose measurements.
    Persliden J; Fransson SG
    Acta Radiol; 1995 Nov; 36(6):641-3. PubMed ID: 8519576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multiple-beam equalization radiography in chest radiology. Image quality and radiation dose considerations.
    Axelsson B; Forsberg H; Hansson B; Haverling M
    Acta Radiol; 1991 Jan; 32(1):12-7. PubMed ID: 2012722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography.
    Bacher K; Smeets P; Bonnarens K; De Hauwere A; Verstraete K; Thierens H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Oct; 181(4):923-9. PubMed ID: 14500203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Advanced multiple beam equalization radiography (AMBER) combined with computed radiography. Preliminary evaluation.
    de Rooy TP; Oestmann JW; Schultze Kool LJ; Vrooman H; Buchmann F
    Acta Radiol; 1993 Sep; 34(5):445-9. PubMed ID: 8369179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative scatter and dose performance of slot-scan and full-field digital chest radiography systems.
    Samei E; Lo JY; Yoshizumi TT; Jesneck JL; Dobbins JT; Floyd CE; McAdams HP; Ravin CE
    Radiology; 2005 Jun; 235(3):940-9. PubMed ID: 15845791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Advanced multiple-beam equalization radiography in chest radiology: a simulated nodule detection study.
    Kool LJ; Busscher DL; Vlasbloem H; Hermans J; vd Merwe PC; Algra PR; Herstel W
    Radiology; 1988 Oct; 169(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 3420280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Film-based chest radiography: AMBER vs asymmetric screen-film systems.
    Chotas HG; Floyd CE; Ravin CE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Oct; 161(4):743-7. PubMed ID: 8372749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Digital slot-scan charge-coupled device radiography versus AMBER and Bucky screen-film radiography: comparison of image quality in a phantom study.
    Veldkamp WJ; Kroft LJ; Mertens BJ; Geleijns J
    Radiology; 2005 Jun; 235(3):857-66. PubMed ID: 15845787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Digital beam attenuator technique for compensated chest radiography.
    Hasegawa BH; Naimuddin S; Dobbins JT; Mistretta CA; Peppler WW; Hangiandreou NJ; Cusma JT; McDermott JC; Kudva BV; Melbye KM
    Radiology; 1986 May; 159(2):537-43. PubMed ID: 3961188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Monte Carlo estimation of effective dose in chest tomosynthesis.
    Sabol JM
    Med Phys; 2009 Dec; 36(12):5480-7. PubMed ID: 20095260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [The determination of the surface and organ doses in the AMBER system. Advanced Multiple Beam Equalization Radiography].
    Herzog R; von Boetticher H; Luska G
    Rofo; 1993 May; 158(5):483-6. PubMed ID: 8490159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. AMBER: a scanning multiple-beam equalization system for chest radiography.
    Vlasbloem H; Kool LJ
    Radiology; 1988 Oct; 169(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 3420279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bone marrow dose in chest radiography: the posteroanterior vs. anteroposterior projection.
    Archer BR; Whitmore RC; North LB; Bushong SC
    Radiology; 1979 Oct; 133(1):211-6. PubMed ID: 472293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Optimization of chest radiographic imaging parameters: a comparison of image quality and entrance skin dose for digital chest radiography systems.
    Sun Z; Lin C; Tyan Y; Ng KH
    Clin Imaging; 2012; 36(4):279-86. PubMed ID: 22726965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Optimisation of image plate radiography with respect to tube voltage.
    Tingberg A; Sjöström D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):286-93. PubMed ID: 15933123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Saving dose in triple-rule-out computed tomography examination using a high-pitch dual spiral technique.
    Sommer WH; Schenzle JC; Becker CR; Nikolaou K; Graser A; Michalski G; Neumaier K; Reiser MF; Johnson TR
    Invest Radiol; 2010 Feb; 45(2):64-71. PubMed ID: 20027121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Image quality and radiation dose on digital chest imaging: comparison of amorphous silicon and amorphous selenium flat-panel systems.
    Bacher K; Smeets P; Vereecken L; De Hauwere A; Duyck P; De Man R; Verstraete K; Thierens H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Sep; 187(3):630-7. PubMed ID: 16928923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An investigation into the radiation dose associated with different imaging systems for chest radiology.
    Marshall NW; Faulkner K; Busch HP; Marsh DM; Pfenning H
    Br J Radiol; 1994 Apr; 67(796):353-9. PubMed ID: 8173876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Physical image quality comparison of four types of digital detector for chest radiology.
    Fernandez JM; Ordiales JM; Guibelalde E; Prieto C; Vano E
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):140-3. PubMed ID: 18283060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.