These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

78 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1439063)

  • 1. [Jackknife and bootstrap].
    Chavance M
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 1992; 40(3):209-18. PubMed ID: 1439063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Bootstrap, the Jackknife, and the Randomization Test: A Sampling Taxonomy.
    Rodgers JL
    Multivariate Behav Res; 1999 Oct; 34(4):441-56. PubMed ID: 26801635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Confidence Intervals for Random Forests: The Jackknife and the Infinitesimal Jackknife.
    Wager S; Hastie T; Efron B
    J Mach Learn Res; 2014 Jan; 15(1):1625-1651. PubMed ID: 25580094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Creating non-parametric bootstrap samples using Poisson frequencies.
    Hanley JA; MacGibbon B
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2006 Jul; 83(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 16730851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Standard errors in covariance structure models: asymptotics versus bootstrap.
    Yuan KH; Hayashi K
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2006 Nov; 59(Pt 2):397-417. PubMed ID: 17067418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On population size estimators in the Poisson mixture model.
    Mao CX; Yang N; Zhong J
    Biometrics; 2013 Sep; 69(3):758-65. PubMed ID: 23865502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Variance Estimation for Logistic Regression in Case-cohort Studies.
    Noma H
    J Epidemiol; 2024 Jan; 34(1):38-40. PubMed ID: 36642515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of bootstrap methods and an adjusted bootstrap approach for estimating the prediction error in microarray classification.
    Jiang W; Simon R
    Stat Med; 2007 Dec; 26(29):5320-34. PubMed ID: 17624926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. CONFIDENCE LIMITS ON PHYLOGENIES: AN APPROACH USING THE BOOTSTRAP.
    Felsenstein J
    Evolution; 1985 Jul; 39(4):783-791. PubMed ID: 28561359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A simple and efficient bias-reduced estimator of response probability following a group sequential phase II trial.
    Guo HY; Liu A
    J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(5):773-81. PubMed ID: 16078384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimating the response rate in the presence of measurement error.
    Qu Y; Kulkarni PM; Sanger TM
    Stat Med; 2007 Jan; 26(1):197-211. PubMed ID: 16526011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Simple efficient bias corrected instrumental variable estimator for randomized trials with noncompliance.
    Chan KC
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2012 Jul; 33(4):786-93. PubMed ID: 22484340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Variance estimation for clustered recurrent event data with a small number of clusters.
    Schaubel DE
    Stat Med; 2005 Oct; 24(19):3037-51. PubMed ID: 16149126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Variance estimation for complex surveys using replication techniques.
    Rust KF; Rao JN
    Stat Methods Med Res; 1996 Sep; 5(3):283-310. PubMed ID: 8931197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of bootstrap approaches for estimating uncertainty of parameters in linear mixed-effects models.
    Thai HT; Mentré F; Holford NH; Veyrat-Follet C; Comets E
    Pharm Stat; 2013; 12(3):129-40. PubMed ID: 23457061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessing Variability of Complex Descriptive Statistics in Monte Carlo Studies using Resampling Methods.
    Boos DD; Osborne JA
    Int Stat Rev; 2015 Aug; 83(2):228-238. PubMed ID: 26345317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Spurious 99% bootstrap and jackknife support for unsupported clades.
    Simmons MP; Freudenstein JV
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2011 Oct; 61(1):177-91. PubMed ID: 21703355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Attributable fraction estimation from complex sample survey data.
    Heeringa SG; Berglund PA; West BT; Mellipilán ER; Portier K
    Ann Epidemiol; 2015 Mar; 25(3):174-8. PubMed ID: 25511308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On estimating the proportion of variance in a phenotypic trait attributable to a measured locus.
    Wijsman EM; Nur N
    Hum Hered; 2001; 51(3):145-9. PubMed ID: 11173965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Adjusting for bias in C/E ratio estimates.
    Stinnett AA
    Health Econ; 1996; 5(5):470-2. PubMed ID: 8922973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.