These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1439502)

  • 1. The super-bass bone-anchored hearing aid compared to conventional hearing aids. Audiological results and the patients' opinions.
    Snik AF; Jorritsma FF; Cremers CW; Beynon AJ; van den Berge NW
    Scand Audiol; 1992; 21(3):157-61. PubMed ID: 1439502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Audiologic results for the bone-anchored hearing aid HC220.
    Mylanus EA; Snik AF; Jorritsma FF; Cremers CW
    Ear Hear; 1994 Feb; 15(1):87-92. PubMed ID: 8194683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Audiological results of the bone-anchored hearing aid HC200: multicenter results.
    Mylanus EA; Snik FM; Cremers CW; Jorritsma FF; Verschuure H
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1994 May; 103(5 Pt 1):368-74. PubMed ID: 8179253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Speech recognition with the bone-anchored hearing aid determined objectively and subjectively.
    Snik AF; Mylanus EA; Cremers CW
    Ear Nose Throat J; 1994 Feb; 73(2):115-7. PubMed ID: 8168444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hearing with the bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA, HC 200) compared to a conventional bone-conduction hearing aid.
    Cremers CW; Snik FM; Beynon AJ
    Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci; 1992 Jun; 17(3):275-9. PubMed ID: 1505098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Comparison of audiological performance bewteen bone-anchored and conventional hearing aids].
    Iwasaki S; Hashimoto Y; Nagura M; Takebayashi S; Mizuta K; Mineta H
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 2005 Nov; 108(11):1110-3. PubMed ID: 16359006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The bone-anchored hearing aid compared with conventional hearing aids. Audiologic results and the patients' opinions.
    Snik AF; Mylanus EA; Cremers CW
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1995 Feb; 28(1):73-83. PubMed ID: 7739870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Audiological assessment with Matrix sentence test of percutaneous vs transcutaneous bone-anchored hearing aids: a pilot study.
    Portelli D; Ciodaro F; Loteta S; Alberti G; Bruno R
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2023 Sep; 280(9):4065-4072. PubMed ID: 36933021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intraindividual comparison of the bone-anchored hearing aid and air-conduction hearing aids.
    Mylanus EA; van der Pouw KC; Snik AF; Cremers CW
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1998 Mar; 124(3):271-6. PubMed ID: 9525510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Retrospective audiological analysis of bone conduction versus round window vibratory stimulation in patients with mixed hearing loss.
    Mojallal H; Schwab B; Hinze AL; Giere T; Lenarz T
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Jun; 54(6):391-400. PubMed ID: 25735204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Amplification of transcutaneous and percutaneous bone-conduction devices with a test-band in an induced model of conductive hearing loss.
    Park MJ; Lee JR; Yang CJ; Yoo MH; Jin IS; Choi CH; Park HJ
    Int J Audiol; 2016 Nov; 55(11):653-7. PubMed ID: 27347717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Patients' opinions of bone-anchored vs conventional hearing aids.
    Mylanus EA; Snik AF; Cremers CW
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1995 Apr; 121(4):421-5. PubMed ID: 7702816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical results with a percutaneous bone-anchored hearing aid.
    Abramson M; Fay TH; Kelly JP; Wazen JJ; Liden G; Tjellstrom A
    Laryngoscope; 1989 Jul; 99(7 Pt 1):707-10. PubMed ID: 2747393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Audiological effect of bone-anchored hearing aid].
    Kondoh K; Matsushiro N; Satoh T; Kuramasu T; Kubo T
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 2005 Dec; 108(12):1144-51. PubMed ID: 16440811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The BAHA HC200/300 in comparison with conventional bone conduction hearing aids.
    van der Pouw CT; Snik AF; Cremers CW
    Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci; 1999 Jun; 24(3):171-6. PubMed ID: 10384840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Short- and long-term results with implantable transcutaneous and percutaneous bone-conduction devices.
    Snik AF; Dreschler WA; Tange RA; Cremers CW
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1998 Mar; 124(3):265-8. PubMed ID: 9525509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hearing gain with a BAHA test-band in patients with single-sided deafness.
    Kim DY; Kim TS; Shim BS; Jin IS; Ahn JH; Chung JW; Yoon TH; Park HJ
    Am J Otolaryngol; 2014; 35(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 24035184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Better performance with bone-anchored hearing aid than acoustic devices in patients with severe air-bone gap.
    de Wolf MJ; Hendrix S; Cremers CW; Snik AF
    Laryngoscope; 2011 Mar; 121(3):613-6. PubMed ID: 21344443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hearing rehabilitation using the BAHA bone-anchored hearing aid: results in 40 patients.
    Lustig LR; Arts HA; Brackmann DE; Francis HF; Molony T; Megerian CA; Moore GF; Moore KM; Morrow T; Potsic W; Rubenstein JT; Srireddy S; Syms CA; Takahashi G; Vernick D; Wackym PA; Niparko JK
    Otol Neurotol; 2001 May; 22(3):328-34. PubMed ID: 11347635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Long-term results of bone-anchored hearing aid recipients who had previously used air-conduction hearing aids.
    Hol MK; Snik AF; Mylanus EA; Cremers CW
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2005 Apr; 131(4):321-5. PubMed ID: 15837900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.