These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

47 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1439595)

  • 1. [Comparison of the quality of diagnostic approaches using the characteristic (ROC) curve test].
    Skalská H
    Sb Ved Pr Lek Fak Karlovy Univerzity Hradci Kralove Suppl; 1992; 35(1):99-109. PubMed ID: 1439595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A permutation test for comparing ROC curves in multireader studies a multi-reader ROC, permutation test.
    Bandos AI; Rockette HE; Gur D
    Acad Radiol; 2006 Apr; 13(4):414-20. PubMed ID: 16554220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A new parametric method based on S-distributions for computing receiver operating characteristic curves for continuous diagnostic tests.
    Sorribas A; March J; Trujillano J
    Stat Med; 2002 May; 21(9):1213-35. PubMed ID: 12111875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A permutation test sensitive to differences in areas for comparing ROC curves from a paired design.
    Bandos AI; Rockette HE; Gur D
    Stat Med; 2005 Sep; 24(18):2873-93. PubMed ID: 16134144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of correlated receiver operating characteristic curves derived from repeated diagnostic test data.
    Zou KH
    Acad Radiol; 2001 Mar; 8(3):225-33. PubMed ID: 11249086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On the exact interval estimation for the difference in paired areas under the ROC curves.
    Li CR; Liao CT; Liu JP
    Stat Med; 2008 Jan; 27(2):224-42. PubMed ID: 17139702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Analysis of correlated ROC areas in diagnostic testing.
    Song HH
    Biometrics; 1997 Mar; 53(1):370-82. PubMed ID: 9147602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A non-inferiority test for diagnostic accuracy based on the paired partial areas under ROC curves.
    Li CR; Liao CT; Liu JP
    Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(10):1762-76. PubMed ID: 17968858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bayesian bootstrap estimation of ROC curve.
    Gu J; Ghosal S; Roy A
    Stat Med; 2008 Nov; 27(26):5407-20. PubMed ID: 18613217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. ROC methodology within a monitoring framework.
    Parker CB; DeLong ER
    Stat Med; 2003 Nov; 22(22):3473-88. PubMed ID: 14601014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Review of the new methodology of analyzing receiver operating characteristic curves.
    Ikeda M; Ishigaki T; Yamauchi K
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 1998; 52 Pt 2():837-40. PubMed ID: 10384578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of non-parametric confidence intervals for the area under the ROC curve of a continuous-scale diagnostic test.
    Gengsheng Qin ; Hotilovac L
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2008 Apr; 17(2):207-21. PubMed ID: 18426855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Three approaches to regression analysis of receiver operating characteristic curves for continuous test results.
    Pepe MS
    Biometrics; 1998 Mar; 54(1):124-35. PubMed ID: 9544511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Practical application of receiver operating characteristic curve on laboratory diagnosis].
    Matsuo S; Takahashi H
    Rinsho Byori; 1994 Jun; 42(6):585-90. PubMed ID: 8051801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A global goodness-of-fit test for receiver operating characteristic curve analysis via the bootstrap method.
    Zou KH; Resnic FS; Talos IF; Goldberg-Zimring D; Bhagwat JG; Haker SJ; Kikinis R; Jolesz FA; Ohno-Machado L
    J Biomed Inform; 2005 Oct; 38(5):395-403. PubMed ID: 16198998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [ROC-curve analysis. A statistical method for the evaluation of diagnostic tests].
    Albeck MJ; Børgesen SE
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1990 Jun; 152(23):1650-3. PubMed ID: 2194326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An ROC-type measure of diagnostic accuracy when the gold standard is continuous-scale.
    Obuchowski NA
    Stat Med; 2006 Feb; 25(3):481-93. PubMed ID: 16287217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. When is a test positive? The use of decision analysis to optimize test interpretation.
    Bergus GR
    Fam Med; 1993; 25(10):656-60. PubMed ID: 8288070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Surgical quality improvement: a simplified method to apply national standards to pediatric trauma care.
    Leaphart CL; Graham D; Pieper P; Celso BG; Tepas JJ
    J Pediatr Surg; 2009 Jan; 44(1):156-9. PubMed ID: 19159735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ordered multiple-class ROC analysis with continuous measurements.
    Nakas CT; Yiannoutsos CT
    Stat Med; 2004 Nov; 23(22):3437-49. PubMed ID: 15505886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.