These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14398164)

  • 1. The incidence of caesarean section and the results of all deliveries in Sweden in the years 1949-1951.
    SIMON L
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1955; 34(2):151-60. PubMed ID: 14398164
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Obstetrical trends; including a review of 6,941 deliveries and an analysis of recent obstetrical work at the U.S. Army Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany.
    DANIEL CT
    Med Bull US Army Eur; 1956 Jan; 13(1):15-9; passim. PubMed ID: 13287428
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Incidence of maternal mortality in surgical deliveries].
    SCHIAVO CD; SCALA LM
    Sem Med; 1955 Jun; 106(24):859-63. PubMed ID: 13246702
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Excessive use of cesarean section for the second twin?
    Wolff K
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2000; 50(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 10895024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Maternal mortality in cesarean section as compared to vaginal delivery].
    Krone HA; Mattheus J
    Fortschr Med; 1975 Sep; 93(27):1266-8. PubMed ID: 1222926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Maternal body mass index as a predictor for delivery method.
    Pettersen-Dahl A; Murzakanova G; Sandvik L; Laine K
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2018 Feb; 97(2):212-218. PubMed ID: 29164597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ten years' Caesarean section in Denmark 1941 to 1950, with special reference to indications and maternal mortality.
    BRANDSTRUP E; SCHOU P
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1954; 33(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 13157981
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Effects of more extensive indications for cesarean section as reflected in Hamburg official obstetric statistics].
    MITTELSTRASS H; WINKELMANN P
    Arch Gynakol; 1955; 186():64-5. PubMed ID: 13259528
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Malpractice and obstetric practice: the correlation of malpractice premiums to rates of vaginal and cesarean delivery.
    Johnson CT; Choubey V; Satin AJ; Werner EF
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Apr; 214(4):545-546. PubMed ID: 26767796
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Vaginal delivery after previous cesarean section].
    Słomko Z; Breborowicz G; Malewski Z; Kapczyński W
    Ginekol Pol; 1992 Feb; 63(2):49-56. PubMed ID: 1305587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Relation of the delivery by cesarean section to the mortality, morbidity and late development of the children].
    RIESS H
    Z Geburtshilfe Gynakol; 1954; 142(1):44-66. PubMed ID: 13227065
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The association between increasing maternal age at first birth and decreased rates of spontaneous vaginal birth in South Australia from 1991 to 2009.
    Baghurst P; Robson S; Antoniou G; Scheil W; Bryce R
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2014 Jun; 54(3):237-43. PubMed ID: 24506445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Vaginal delivery after caesarean section: a propective study of 146 cases.
    Kouam L; Nkemayim DC; Nsangou I; Tebeu PM; Doh AS
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 2006 Aug; 128(4):213-6. PubMed ID: 16835816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mode of delivery and the probability of subsequent childbearing: a population-based register study.
    Elvander C; Dahlberg J; Andersson G; Cnattingius S
    BJOG; 2015 Nov; 122(12):1593-600. PubMed ID: 25135574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Caesarean section and risk for endometriosis: a prospective cohort study of Swedish registries.
    Andolf E; Thorsell M; Källén K
    BJOG; 2013 Aug; 120(9):1061-5. PubMed ID: 23663181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Increasing use of cesarean section, even in developing countries].
    Onsrud L; Onsrud M
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1996 Jan; 116(1):67-71. PubMed ID: 8553342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cesarean delivery in the United Kingdom: time trends in the general practice research database.
    Black C; Kaye JA; Jick H
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Jul; 106(1):151-5. PubMed ID: 15994631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perinatal infant mortality associated with a conservative policy regarding cesarean section: analysis of 7,871 deliveries at the North Carolina Baptist Hospital.
    LOCK FR; MAY J
    South Med J; 1957 Oct; 50(10):1239-45. PubMed ID: 13486252
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Central fetal monitoring: effect on perinatal outcomes and cesarean section rate.
    Withiam-Leitch M; Shelton J; Fleming E
    Birth; 2006 Dec; 33(4):284-8. PubMed ID: 17150066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Evaluation of changes in the mode of twin deliveries over the years].
    Madej A; Szymusik I; Oledzka M; Kosińska-Kaczyńska K; Bomba-Opoń DA; Wielgoś M
    Ginekol Pol; 2012 Oct; 83(10):754-9. PubMed ID: 23383561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.