128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1439830)
1. Identity crisis: teaching v. research.
Culotta E
Science; 1992 Nov; 258(5085):1223-4. PubMed ID: 1439830
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Science education. Reshuffling graduate training.
Mervis J
Science; 2009 Jul; 325(5940):528-30. PubMed ID: 19644085
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Increase grants, too.
Castellano MJ; Mueller KE
Science; 2009 Sep; 325(5947):1498. PubMed ID: 19762626
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Science and the Federal government: which way to go.
Handler P
Fed Proc; 1970; 29(3):1089-97. PubMed ID: 5443774
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Boom ahead for graduate education.
Nature; 1969 Mar; 221(5183):800-2. PubMed ID: 5765047
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Education. Workforce alternatives to graduate students?
Gerbi SA; Garrison HH; Perkins JP
Science; 2001 May; 292(5521):1489-90. PubMed ID: 11379627
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. National Science Foundation: glad hand from Mr. Daddario.
Nature; 1970 Apr; 226(5241):104. PubMed ID: 5436994
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Grumbles at Dr DuBridge.
Nature; 1970 Aug; 227(5260):769-70. PubMed ID: 5432236
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Restructure conflicting grant incentives.
Moosavi SC
Science; 2009 Oct; 326(5952):521. PubMed ID: 19900879
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. What went wrong: why programs failed.
Sims C
Science; 1992 Nov; 258(5085):1185-7. PubMed ID: 1439829
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. An open letter to the administration on indirect costs.
Pings CJ
Acad Med; 1994 May; 69(5):356-8. PubMed ID: 8166915
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The University of Pennsylvania plan to develop scientists in medical research.
Terry LL; Ferrigan M
J Med Educ; 1971 Jul; 46(7):610-3. PubMed ID: 5558301
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Damage to graduate education.
Harris M; Wolfle D
Science; 1968 Jun; 160(3833):1185. PubMed ID: 5648258
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Science education. Educating future scientists.
Sung NS; Gordon JI; Rose GD; Getzoff ED; Kron SJ; Mumford D; Onuchic JN; Scherer NF; Sumners DL; Kopell NJ
Science; 2003 Sep; 301(5639):1485. PubMed ID: 12970550
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The paradox of science in the universities.
Harris M; Wolfle D
Science; 1968 Jul; 161(3838):223. PubMed ID: 5657324
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. NIH training grants. Universities may have to pay more in support of graduate training.
Bhattacharjee Y
Science; 2005 Dec; 310(5754):1601. PubMed ID: 16339419
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Stable funding is key.
Butera RJ
Science; 2009 Sep; 325(5947):1499. PubMed ID: 19762628
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. How to succeed in science: a concise guide for young biomedical scientists. Part I: taking the plunge.
Yewdell JW
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol; 2008 May; 9(5):413-6. PubMed ID: 18401348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Graduate training in dermatology. Science and the federal government.
Handler P
Arch Dermatol; 1969 Mar; 99(3):257-65. PubMed ID: 5767211
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Relationships between science and Federal programs.
Shannon JA
Fed Proc; 1967 Sep; 26(5):1275-80. PubMed ID: 6051306
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
