These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1440429)

  • 1. Management of the patient with an abnormal Papanicolaou smear.
    Iliya FA; Yazigi R
    Tex Med; 1992 Aug; 88(8):63-7. PubMed ID: 1440429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Cytological and colposcopic diagnosis of decidual ectopy of the cervix (author's transl)].
    Krupiński L; Madej J
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1981 Jul; 41(7):474-7. PubMed ID: 6911086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The significance of a negative Papanicolaou smear with hyperkeratosis or parakeratosis.
    Andrews S; Miyazawa K
    Obstet Gynecol; 1989 May; 73(5 Pt 1):751-3. PubMed ID: 2704502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. New concepts in the evaluation of the abnormal Papanicolaou smear.
    Roy M; Townsend DE; DiSaia PJ; Morrow CP
    J Fam Pract; 1974; 1(3-4):10-3. PubMed ID: 4141723
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The management and treatment of an abnormal Pap smear.
    Hansell RS; Rogers RE
    Indiana Med; 1990 Jul; 83(7):468-73. PubMed ID: 2197326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Invasive cancer following outpatient evaluation and therapy for cervical disease.
    Townsend DE; Richart RM; Marks E; Nielsen J
    Obstet Gynecol; 1981 Feb; 57(2):145-9. PubMed ID: 7465117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of the endocervical brush and the endocervical curettage for the evaluation of the endocervical canal.
    Martin D; Umpierre SA; Villamarzo G; Sánchez O; Sánchez J; Carrodeguas J; Adamsons K
    P R Health Sci J; 1995 Sep; 14(3):195-7. PubMed ID: 8588020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The value of endocervical curettage as part of the standard colposcopic evaluation.
    Granai CO; Jelen I; Louis F; Kawada CY; Curry SL
    J Reprod Med; 1985 May; 30(5):373-5. PubMed ID: 4009557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Abnormal Papanicolaou smears. Evaluation by colposcopy, biopsies, and endocervical curettage.
    Townsend DE; Ostergard DR; Mishell DR; Hirose FM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1970 Oct; 108(3):429-34. PubMed ID: 5484600
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Value of wet mount and cervical cultures at the time of cervical cytology in asymptomatic women.
    Eltabbakh GH; Eltabbakh GD; Broekhuizen FF; Griner BT
    Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Apr; 85(4):499-503. PubMed ID: 7898823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The value of colposcopy in evaluating cervical intraepithelial neoplasia during pregnancy.
    Behnam K; Mariano E
    Diagn Gynecol Obstet; 1982; 4(2):133-5. PubMed ID: 7094819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prevalence and management of abnormal pap smear in antenatal care clinic at Thammasat University Hospital.
    Sueblinvong T; Suwannarurk K; Chanthasenanont A; Treetampinich C; Pongrojpaw D
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2005 Feb; 88(2):133-7. PubMed ID: 15962660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cold knife conization of the cervix uteri.
    Nebel W; Shingleton HM; Swanton MC
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1967 Oct; 125(4):780-4. PubMed ID: 6041720
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Endocervical brush cytology. An alternative to endocervical curettage?
    Weitzman GA; Korhonen MO; Reeves KO; Irwin JF; Carter TS; Kaufman RH
    J Reprod Med; 1988 Aug; 33(8):677-83. PubMed ID: 3172071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Papanicolaou test in pregnancy].
    Cheng X; Bian X; Lang J; Gai M; Liu X; Zhang J; Liu M
    Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2000 Apr; 22(2):174-6. PubMed ID: 12903522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A study of abnormal cervical cytology in pregnant women.
    Yamazaki T; Inaba F; Takeda N; Furuno M; Kamemori T; Kosaka N; Ohta Y; Fukasawa I; Inaba N
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2006 Mar; 273(6):355-9. PubMed ID: 16208482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Papanicolaou smears without endocervical cells. Are they inadequate?
    Kivlahan C; Ingram E
    Acta Cytol; 1986; 30(3):258-60. PubMed ID: 3459326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The role of colposcopy in the management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia during pregnancy and postpartum.
    Kohan S; Beckman EM; Bigelow B; Klein SA; Douglas GW
    J Reprod Med; 1980 Nov; 25(5):279-84. PubMed ID: 7452638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical evaluation of follow-up methods and results of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance (AGUS) detected on cervicovaginal Pap smears.
    Kim TJ; Kim HS; Park CT; Park IS; Hong SR; Park JS; Shim JU
    Gynecol Oncol; 1999 May; 73(2):292-8. PubMed ID: 10329049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. RO-TAGE biopsy. An improved method of endocervical evaluation.
    Mann WJ; Chumas J; Rochelson B; Funt M; Westermann C
    J Reprod Med; 1985 May; 30(5):376-8. PubMed ID: 4009558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.