These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1441934)

  • 1. Microleakage of indirect composite inlays. An in vitro comparison with the direct technique.
    Milleding P
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1992 Oct; 50(5):295-301. PubMed ID: 1441934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Microleakage of indirect inlays placed on different kinds of glass ionomer cement linings.
    Karaağaclioğlu L; Zaimoğlu A; Akören AC
    J Oral Rehabil; 1992 Sep; 19(5):457-69. PubMed ID: 1453258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Adhesion of indirect MOD resin composite inlays luted with self-adhesive and self-etching resin cements.
    Inukai T; Abe T; Ito Y; Pilecki P; Wilson RF; Watson TF; Foxton RM
    Oper Dent; 2012; 37(5):474-84. PubMed ID: 22360367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of microleakage of three acid-base luting cements versus one resin-bonded cement for Class V direct composite inlays.
    Piemjai M; Miyasaka K; Iwasaki Y; Nakabayashi N
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Dec; 88(6):598-603. PubMed ID: 12488852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Microleakage of direct and indirect inlay/onlay systems.
    Hasanreĭsoğlu U; Sönmez H; Uçtaşli S; Wilson HJ
    J Oral Rehabil; 1996 Jan; 23(1):66-71. PubMed ID: 8850164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
    Kasraei S; Azarsina M; Majidi S
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of occlusal finish line configuration on microleakage of indirect composite inlays.
    Peixoto RT; Poletto LT; Lanza MD; Buono VT
    J Adhes Dent; 2002; 4(2):145-50. PubMed ID: 12236643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Marginal microleakage of resin-modified glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations: effect of using etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives.
    Khoroushi M; Karvandi TM; Kamali B; Mazaheri H
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(3):378-83. PubMed ID: 23059577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Microleakage of glass ionomer/composite resin restorations: a laboratory study. 1. The influence of glass ionomer cement.
    Smith ED; Martin FE
    Aust Dent J; 1992 Feb; 37(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 1533112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In vitro evaluation of microleakage of indirect composite inlays cemented with four luting agents.
    Gerdolle DA; Mortier E; Loos-Ayav C; Jacquot B; Panighi MM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jun; 93(6):563-70. PubMed ID: 15942618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Microleakage studies comparing a one-visit indirect composite inlay system and a direct composite restorative technique.
    Cassin AM; Pearson GJ
    J Oral Rehabil; 1992 May; 19(3):265-70. PubMed ID: 1500970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Microleakage at gingival dentin margins of Class V composite restorations lined with light-cured glass ionomer cement.
    Tjan AH; Dunn JR
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1990 Dec; 121(6):706-10. PubMed ID: 2277155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Marginal adaptation of Class V restorations using different restorative techniques.
    Krejci I; Lutz F
    J Dent; 1991 Feb; 19(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 1901872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Microleakage of indirect composite inlays.
    Hasegawa EA; Boyer DB; Chan DC
    Dent Mater; 1989 Nov; 5(6):388-91. PubMed ID: 2700973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Microleakage associated with resin composite-cemented, cast glass ceramic restoration.
    Blair KF; Koeppen RG; Schwartz RS; Davis RD
    Int J Prosthodont; 1993; 6(6):579-84. PubMed ID: 8148030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative evaluation of microleakage of a carbomer/fluoroapatite-enhanced glass-ionomer cement on primary teeth restorations.
    Tolidis K; Boutsiouki C; Gerasimou P
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2016 Sep; 17(3):227-233. PubMed ID: 27759413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Microleakage of Class V resin-modified glass ionomer and compomer restorations.
    Toledano M; Osorio E; Osorio R; García-Godoy F
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 May; 81(5):610-5. PubMed ID: 10220667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Microleakage of composite and two types of glass ionomer restorations with saliva contamination at different steps.
    Farmer SN; Ludlow SW; Donaldson ME; Tantbirojn D; Versluis A
    Pediatr Dent; 2014; 36(1):14-7. PubMed ID: 24717701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Microleakage in ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements.
    Mota CS; Demarco FF; Camacho GB; Powers JM
    J Adhes Dent; 2003; 5(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 12729085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of the internal conditioning of indirect restorations of resin composite in relation to microleakage using LEDs and QTH units.
    Calabrez-Filho S; Calabrez VC; Reston EG; de Andrade MF; Borges LH
    Oper Dent; 2009; 34(3):293-8. PubMed ID: 19544818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.