These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14423474)
1. Cold knife conization of the cervix: a simple tourniquet suture for hemostasis. MOLUMPHY PE; MARKLEY R; GARCIA R; RUSSELL E Obstet Gynecol; 1959 Sep; 14():398-401. PubMed ID: 14423474 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Randomized clinical trial comparing cold knife conization of the cervix with and without lateral hemostatic sutures. Bueno LR; Binda M; Monego H; Scherer RL; Rolim KM; Bottini AL; Fregnani JH; dos Reis R Int J Surg; 2015 Jun; 18():224-9. PubMed ID: 25937157 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A randomized study comparing suture with non-suture cold-knife conization. Tangtrakul S; Srisupundit S; Linasmita V; Bullangpoti S; Israngura N; Wilailak S; Panijayanusondthi O J Obstet Gynaecol (Tokyo 1995); 1995 Dec; 21(6):587-91. PubMed ID: 8640470 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bloodless technique of cold knife conization (ring biopsy). SCOTT JW; WELCH WB; BLAKE TF Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1960 Jan; 79():62-6. PubMed ID: 14444246 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Cold knife conization of the cervix: a new technique. GUTGLASS MF; WALDREN H Med Times; 1963 Jul; 91():664-5. PubMed ID: 13951418 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Lateral hemostatic sutures in cold knife conization of the cervix. What do they accomplish? Brown HW; Rayne SC; Blythe JG; Kraus FT J Reprod Med; 1995 Sep; 40(9):611-3. PubMed ID: 8576874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of complications of laser and cold knife conization. Larsson G; Gullberg B; Grundsell H Obstet Gynecol; 1983 Aug; 62(2):213-7. PubMed ID: 6408545 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A study of diagnostic failure of loop conization in microinvasive carcinoma of the cervix. Tseng CJ; Liang CC; Lin CT; Huang KG; Chou HH; Chang TC; Lai CH; Soong YK; Hsueh S Gynecol Oncol; 1999 Apr; 73(1):91-5. PubMed ID: 10094886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fertility-sparing treatment in younger women with adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix. van Hanegem N; Barroilhet LM; Nucci MR; Bernstein M; Feldman S Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Jan; 124(1):72-7. PubMed ID: 22030403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix: an experience with 100 cases. Ostör AG; Duncan A; Quinn M; Rome R Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Nov; 79(2):207-10. PubMed ID: 11063645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A randomized trial comparing two methods of cold knife conization with laser conization. Kristensen GB; Jensen LK; Hølund B Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Dec; 76(6):1009-13. PubMed ID: 2234708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The prognostic significance of glandular involvement in cold knife conization biopsies in carcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix: an analysis of 136 cases. BAKER WS; HAWKS BL Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1957 Jun; 73(6):1266-76. PubMed ID: 13424591 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A randomized prospective study comparing three techniques of conization: cold knife, laser, and LEEP. Mathevet P; Dargent D; Roy M; Beau G Gynecol Oncol; 1994 Aug; 54(2):175-9. PubMed ID: 8063242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [A comparison between CO2 laser conization and cold knife conization in clinical diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia]. Iwanari O; Moriyama M; Miyako J; Date Y; Kitao M Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Nov; 41(11):1755-60. PubMed ID: 2512361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]