These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14426675)

  • 1. [On cesarean sections at the Universitaets-Frauenklinik Wuerzburg from 1948 to 1958].
    NEUHAUS L; SOHL P
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1960 Feb; 82():264-7. PubMed ID: 14426675
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [The development of indications for cesarean section at the Universitaets-Frauenklinik Kiel in the past 4 decades].
    RUPPRECHT A
    Arch Gynakol; 1963; 198():282-6. PubMed ID: 13975573
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Fetal indications for cesarean section at the Universitaets-Frauenklinik Heidelberg].
    BACH HG
    Arch Gynakol; 1963; 198():290-3. PubMed ID: 13965893
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [The incidence of fetal indications for cesarean section at the Universitaets-Frauenklinik Hamburg-Eppendort].
    HOHNE G
    Arch Gynakol; 1963; 198():286-8. PubMed ID: 13961234
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Abdominal cesarean section at the Univ. Frauenklinik Graz during the years 1949-1958].
    BURGHARDT E; SCHNUTZ D
    Z Geburtshilfe Gynakol; 1962 Feb; 158():16-28. PubMed ID: 13874837
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Reports on the unusual incidence of micromelia and amelia in the year 1961 at the Universitaets-Frauenklinik Wuerzburg].
    CRETIUS K; FUCHS R
    Med Klin; 1962 May; 57():923-7. PubMed ID: 13882163
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Results of abdominal section at the Universitäts-Frauenklinik Hamburg-Eppendorf in the years 1951 to 1965].
    Schultze-Mosgau H; Höhne G; Rieboldt M
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1969 May; 91(21):687-90. PubMed ID: 5372092
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Repeat cesarean section; analysis of 162 repeat cesarean sections in 143 cases as to sequelae and impressions concerning validity of the initial sections.
    BARTHOLOMEW RA; COLVIN ED; GRIMES WH; FISH JS; LESTER WM
    Obstet Gynecol; 1956 Feb; 7(2):137-44. PubMed ID: 13288965
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Perinatal morbidity and mortality in breech birth. Comparison of results of the Städtische Frauenklinik Braunschweig and the Universitäts-Frauenklinik Zagreb].
    Hrgović Z; Langer H; Barsić E
    Gynakol Rundsch; 1983; 23(1):11-24. PubMed ID: 6682820
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Analysis of labor methods after cesarean sections in the last 50 years].
    Łatkowski K; Gryboś M; Blok R; Korzeniewski J
    Pol Merkur Lekarski; 2003 Sep; 15(87):239-43. PubMed ID: 14679848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Analysis of the cesarean section rate in 2 clinics with special reference to differences in the patient sample].
    Schneider H; Hänggi W; Marques L
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1990 Sep; 50(9):710-6. PubMed ID: 2272437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cesarean section: recent trends.
    Martin MC; Moyyen S; Gelfand M
    Can J Surg; 1982 Jan; 25(1):85-7, 91. PubMed ID: 7055772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cesarean section-related maternal mortality in Massachusetts, 1954-1985.
    Sachs BP; Yeh J; Acker D; Driscoll S; Brown DA; Jewett JF
    Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Mar; 71(3 Pt 1):385-8. PubMed ID: 3347424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Retrospective analysis of ocular disorders and frequency of cesarean sections for ocular indications in 2000-2008--our own experience].
    Socha MW; Piotrowiak I; Jagielska I; Kazdepka-Ziemińska A; Szymański M; Duczmal M; Zalewska M; Szymański W
    Ginekol Pol; 2010 Mar; 81(3):188-91. PubMed ID: 20486539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pre-induction sonographic measurement of cervical length in prolonged pregnancy: the effect of parity in the prediction of the need for Cesarean section.
    Rane SM; Guirgis RR; Higgins B; Nicolaides KH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jul; 22(1):45-8. PubMed ID: 12858302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Deliveries in patients with more than 1 cesarean section].
    Wessel J; Schönegg W; Schmidt-Gollwitzer K
    Z Geburtshilfe Perinatol; 1990; 194(3):126-30. PubMed ID: 2378143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Physician bias in cesarean sections.
    Phillips RN; Thornton J; Gleicher N
    JAMA; 1982 Sep; 248(9):1082-4. PubMed ID: 7109201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cesarean section experience at the University of California Hospital.
    KING EB
    Calif Med; 1949 Aug; 71(2):106-9. PubMed ID: 18146911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Analysis of indications for cesarean section in pregnancy complicated by diabetes mellitus].
    Rzempołuch J; Bodzek P; Zamłyński J; Mikulska M; Urban A; Kozioł M; Wolnicka B
    Ginekol Pol; 1999 Oct; 70(10):732-6. PubMed ID: 10615814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The changing trends in cesarean section; analysis of cesarean sections performed in Detroit in 1925, 1930 and 1945.
    MACK HC; SIDDALL RS
    J Mich State Med Soc; 1948 Mar; 47(3):288-93. PubMed ID: 18911196
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.