These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1443240)

  • 1. Problems and considerations in the valid assessment of personality disorders.
    Perry JC
    Am J Psychiatry; 1992 Dec; 149(12):1645-53. PubMed ID: 1443240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Revising and assessing axis II, Part I: developing a clinically and empirically valid assessment method.
    Westen D; Shedler J
    Am J Psychiatry; 1999 Feb; 156(2):258-72. PubMed ID: 9989563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Diagnostic agreement between the Personality Disorder Examination and the MCMI-II.
    Soldz S; Budman S; Demby A; Merry J
    J Pers Assess; 1993 Jun; 60(3):486-99. PubMed ID: 8336264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Maximum likelihood estimates of the ability of the MMPI and MCMI personality disorder scales and the SIDP to identify personality disorders.
    Miller HR; Streiner DL; Parkinson A
    J Pers Assess; 1992 Aug; 59(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 1512671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of a diagnostic checklist with a structured interview for the assessment of DSM-III-R and ICD-10 personality disorders.
    Bronisch T; Mombour W
    Psychopathology; 1994; 27(6):312-20. PubMed ID: 7846256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Divergences between clinical and research methods for assessing personality disorders: implications for research and the evolution of axis II.
    Westen D
    Am J Psychiatry; 1997 Jul; 154(7):895-903. PubMed ID: 9210738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reliability and validity of the Coolidge Axis II Inventory: a new inventory for the assessment of personality disorders.
    Coolidge FL; Merwin MM
    J Pers Assess; 1992 Oct; 59(2):223-38. PubMed ID: 1432558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Personality diagnoses in adolescence: DSM-IV axis II diagnoses and an empirically derived alternative.
    Westen D; Shedler J; Durrett C; Glass S; Martens A
    Am J Psychiatry; 2003 May; 160(5):952-66. PubMed ID: 12727701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Relationship between the Tridimensional Personality Questionnaire and DSM-III-R personality traits.
    Goldman RG; Skodol AE; McGrath PJ; Oldham JM
    Am J Psychiatry; 1994 Feb; 151(2):274-6. PubMed ID: 8296904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validity of the Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire--revised: comparison with two structured interviews.
    Hyler SE; Skodol AE; Kellman HD; Oldham JM; Rosnick L
    Am J Psychiatry; 1990 Aug; 147(8):1043-8. PubMed ID: 2197883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [First results on the reliability and validity of the OPD-2 axis structure].
    Benecke C; Koschier A; Peham D; Bock A; Dahlbender RW; Biebl W; Doering S
    Z Psychosom Med Psychother; 2009; 55(1):84-96. PubMed ID: 19353514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Severity Indices of Personality Problems (SIPP-118) in adolescents: reliability and validity.
    Feenstra DJ; Hutsebaut J; Verheul R; Busschbach JJ
    Psychol Assess; 2011 Sep; 23(3):646-55. PubMed ID: 21500921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Personality disorder and self-report questionnaire.
    Coid J
    Br J Psychiatry; 1993 Feb; 162():265-6. PubMed ID: 8435702
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Diagnostic agreement between the SCID-II screening questionnaire and the Personality Disorder Examination.
    Jacobsberg L; Perry S; Frances A
    J Pers Assess; 1995 Dec; 65(3):428-33. PubMed ID: 8609583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Diagnostic Interview for Depressive Personality.
    Gunderson JG; Phillips KA; Triebwasser J; Hirschfeld RM
    Am J Psychiatry; 1994 Sep; 151(9):1300-4. PubMed ID: 8067484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Personality diagnostic questionnaire 4+ is not useful as a screener in clinical practice.
    de Reus RJ; van den Berg JF; Emmelkamp PM
    Clin Psychol Psychother; 2013; 20(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 21774036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Self-report assessment of the DSM-IV personality disorders. Measurement of trait and distress characteristics: the ADP-IV.
    Schotte CK; de Doncker D; Vankerckhoven C; Vertommen H; Cosyns P
    Psychol Med; 1998 Sep; 28(5):1179-88. PubMed ID: 9794025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validity of the Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire-Revised: a replication in an outpatient sample.
    Hyler SE; Skodol AE; Oldham JM; Kellman HD; Doidge N
    Compr Psychiatry; 1992; 33(2):73-7. PubMed ID: 1544299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reliability and validity of the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview for Children and Adolescents (MINI-KID).
    Sheehan DV; Sheehan KH; Shytle RD; Janavs J; Bannon Y; Rogers JE; Milo KM; Stock SL; Wilkinson B
    J Clin Psychiatry; 2010 Mar; 71(3):313-26. PubMed ID: 20331933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Development and validation of a computerized screening test for personality disorders in DSM-III-R.
    Neal LA; Fox C; Carroll N; Holden M; Barnes P
    Acta Psychiatr Scand; 1997 Apr; 95(4):351-6. PubMed ID: 9150831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.