169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1444745)
21. [Directed colposcopic-cytologic diagnosis in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) (author's transl)].
Naujoks H; Leber I; Humke R
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1982 Jun; 42(6):468-71. PubMed ID: 6921129
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Genomic amplification of the human telomerase gene (TERC) in pap smears predicts the development of cervical cancer.
Heselmeyer-Haddad K; Sommerfeld K; White NM; Chaudhri N; Morrison LE; Palanisamy N; Wang ZY; Auer G; Steinberg W; Ried T
Am J Pathol; 2005 Apr; 166(4):1229-38. PubMed ID: 15793301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Atypical squamous cells and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion in cervical cytology: cytohistological correlation and implication for management in a low-resource setting.
Gupta N; Srinivasan R; Nijhawan R; Rajwanshi A; Dey P; Suri V; Dhaliwal L
Cytopathology; 2011 Jun; 22(3):189-94. PubMed ID: 20629683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [The Papanicolaou classification in the Bethesda system (National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland)].
Broso PR; Buffetti G
Minerva Ginecol; 1993 Nov; 45(11):557-63. PubMed ID: 8121604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Evaluation of the atypical cytologic smear. Validity of the 1991 Bethesda System.
Widra EA; Dookhan D; Jordan A; McCue P; Bibbo M; Dunton CJ
J Reprod Med; 1994 Sep; 39(9):682-4. PubMed ID: 7807479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Educational needs and causes of false diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of unknown significance at a university hospital.
Kumar N; Sayed S; Moloo Z
Afr J Reprod Health; 2011 Mar; 15(1):113-6. PubMed ID: 21987946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The Bethesda System and patient management strategies.
Helmuth RA; Moriarty AT; Schwenk GR
Indiana Med; 1992; 85(6):500-3. PubMed ID: 1431035
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. [The correlation of inflammation and epithelial changes in the Pap smears of cervix uteri].
Kos M; Sarkanj-Golub R; Cupić H; Balicević D
Acta Med Croatica; 2005; 59(4):297-302. PubMed ID: 16334735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A retrospective review on atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance (AGUS) using the Bethesda 2001 classification.
Tam KF; Cheung AN; Liu KL; Ng TY; Pun TC; Chan YM; Wong LC; Ng AW; Ngan HY
Gynecol Oncol; 2003 Dec; 91(3):603-7. PubMed ID: 14675684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Interobserver variability of cervical smears with squamous-cell abnormalities: a Philadelphia study.
Young NA; Naryshkin S; Atkinson BF; Ehya H; Gupta PK; Kline TS; Luff RD
Diagn Cytopathol; 1994 Dec; 11(4):352-7. PubMed ID: 7895574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Genomic amplification of hTERC in paraffin-embedded tissues of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and invasive cancer.
He C; Xu C; Xu M; Yuan Y; Sun Y; Zhao H; Zhang X
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2012 May; 31(3):280-5. PubMed ID: 22498947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Non-diagnostic squamous atypia in cervico-vaginal cytology as a risk factor for early neoplasia.
Melamed MR; Flehinger BJ
Acta Cytol; 1976; 20(2):108-10. PubMed ID: 779384
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion: diagnostic criteria and management.
Kaufman RH
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Oct; 175(4 Pt 2):1120-8. PubMed ID: 8885797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Preventing cervical cancer: the role of the Bethesda system.
Shepherd JC; Fried RA
Am Fam Physician; 1995 Feb; 51(2):434-40, 443-4. PubMed ID: 7840040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The Bethesda classification for squamous intraepithelial lesions: histologic, cytologic, and viral correlates.
Tabbara S; Saleh AD; Andersen WA; Barber SR; Taylor PT; Crum CP
Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Mar; 79(3):338-46. PubMed ID: 1738511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Atypical squamous cells: improvement in cytohistological correlation by the 2001 Bethesda System.
Karateke A; Gurbuz A; Kabaca C; Zati A; Mengulluoglu M; Kir G
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2004; 25(5):615-8. PubMed ID: 15493179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Cervical smear histories of 585 women with biopsy-proven carcinoma in situ.
Bergeron C; Debaque H; Ayivi J; Amaizo S; Fagnani F
Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(6):1676-80. PubMed ID: 9390123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Two-grade Bethesda system of reporting in cervical screening: colposcopist's view.
Prendiville W
Cytopathology; 2015 Dec; 26(6):351-3. PubMed ID: 26767602
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Buckley CH; Butler EB; Fox H
J Clin Pathol; 1982 Jan; 35(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 7037858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Terms without borders: an international approach to terminology.
Herbert DA
Diagn Cytopathol; 2005 Nov; 33(5):352-5. PubMed ID: 16240399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
