107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1445070)
1. A comparison of the pathogenicity of two strains of hog cholera virus. 1. Clinical and pathological studies.
Kamolsiriprichaiporn S; Hooper PT; Morrissy CJ; Westbury HA
Aust Vet J; 1992 Oct; 69(10):240-4. PubMed ID: 1445070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative immunohistopathology in pigs infected with highly virulent or less virulent strains of hog cholera virus.
Narita M; Kawashima K; Kimura K; Mikami O; Shibahara T; Yamada S; Sakoda Y
Vet Pathol; 2000 Sep; 37(5):402-8. PubMed ID: 11055862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Characterization of lesions caused by a South American virulent isolate ('Quillota') of the hog cholera virus.
Quezada M; Cayo L; Carrasco L; Islas A; Lecocq C; Gómez-Villamandos JC; Sierra MA
J Vet Med B Infect Dis Vet Public Health; 2000 Aug; 47(6):411-22. PubMed ID: 11014061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of the pathogenicity of two strains of hog cholera virus. 2. Virological studies.
Kamolsiriprichaiporn S; Morrissy CJ; Westbury HA
Aust Vet J; 1992 Oct; 69(10):245-8. PubMed ID: 1445071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comprehensive evaluation of the host responses to infection with differentially virulent classical swine fever virus strains in pigs.
Wang J; Sun Y; Meng XY; Li LF; Li Y; Luo Y; Wang W; Yu S; Yin C; Li S; Qiu HJ
Virus Res; 2018 Aug; 255():68-76. PubMed ID: 29953916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Characterization and pathogenicity for pigs of a hog cholera virus strain isolated from wild boars.
Leforban Y; Cariolet R
Ann Rech Vet; 1992; 23(1):93-100. PubMed ID: 1387299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Detection of hog cholera virus antigens in experimentally-infected pigs using an antigen-capture ELISA.
Shannon AD; Morrissy C; Mackintosh SG; Westbury HA
Vet Microbiol; 1993 Mar; 34(3):233-48. PubMed ID: 8460468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Persistent hog cholera infection detected during virulence typing of 135 field isolates.
Carbrey EA; Stewart WC; Kresse JI; Snyder ML
Am J Vet Res; 1980 Jun; 41(6):946-9. PubMed ID: 6449165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Analysis of clinical samples for early detection of classical swine fever during infection with low, moderate, and highly virulent strains in relation to the onset of clinical signs.
Donahue BC; Petrowski HM; Melkonian K; Ward GB; Mayr GA; Metwally S
J Virol Methods; 2012 Jan; 179(1):108-15. PubMed ID: 22036595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction, virus isolation, and immunoperoxidase assays for detecting pigs infected with low, moderate, and high virulent strains of classical swine fever virus.
Handel K; Kehler H; Hills K; Pasick J
J Vet Diagn Invest; 2004 Mar; 16(2):132-8. PubMed ID: 15053364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantification of classical swine fever virus in aerosols originating from pigs infected with strains of high, moderate or low virulence.
Weesendorp E; Stegeman A; Loeffen WL
Vet Microbiol; 2009 Mar; 135(3-4):222-30. PubMed ID: 19013029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Virus multiplication in pigs inoculated with lapinized hog cholera live vaccine].
Lin TC; Shieh CM; Su JF
Zhonghua Min Guo Wei Sheng Wu Xue Za Zhi; 1974 Mar; 7(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 4479605
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Early pathogenesis of classical swine fever virus (CSFV) strains in Danish pigs.
Lohse L; Nielsen J; Uttenthal A
Vet Microbiol; 2012 Oct; 159(3-4):327-36. PubMed ID: 22608103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative studies on the pathogenicity and tissue distribution of three virulence variants of classical swine fever virus, two field isolates and one vaccine strain, with special regard to immunohistochemical investigations.
Belák K; Koenen F; Vanderhallen H; Mittelholzer C; Feliziani F; De Mia GM; Belák S
Acta Vet Scand; 2008 Sep; 50(1):34. PubMed ID: 18775072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Virulence evaluation of classical swine fever virus subgenotype 2.1 and 2.2 isolates circulating in China.
Gong W; Li J; Wang Z; Sun J; Mi S; Lu Z; Cao J; Dou Z; Sun Y; Wang P; Yuan K; Zhang L; Zhou X; He S; Tu C
Vet Microbiol; 2019 May; 232():114-120. PubMed ID: 31030834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Clinical and pathomorphological studies of rabbits injected with virulent and lapinized swine plague virus].
Petkov P; Vasilev V; Gavrilov N
Vet Med Nauki; 1978; 15(7):99-106. PubMed ID: 571168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Activation and modulation of antiviral and apoptotic genes in pigs infected with classical swine fever viruses of high, moderate or low virulence.
Durand SV; Hulst MM; de Wit AA; Mastebroek L; Loeffen WL
Arch Virol; 2009; 154(9):1417-31. PubMed ID: 19649765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [The leukocyte count is a valuable parameter for detecting classical swine fever].
Stegeman JA; Bouma A; Elbers AR; Verheijden JH
Tijdschr Diergeneeskd; 2000 Sep; 125(17):511-8. PubMed ID: 11002499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Isolation and Characterization of a Moderately Virulent Classical Swine Fever Virus Emerging in China.
Luo Y; Ji S; Liu Y; Lei JL; Xia SL; Wang Y; Du ML; Shao L; Meng XY; Zhou M; Sun Y; Qiu HJ
Transbound Emerg Dis; 2017 Dec; 64(6):1848-1857. PubMed ID: 27658930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pathogenicity and kinetics of virus propagation in swine infected with the cytopathogenic classical swine fever virus containing defective interfering particles.
Aoki H; Ishikawa K; Sekiguchi H; Suzuki S; Fukusho A
Arch Virol; 2003 Feb; 148(2):297-310. PubMed ID: 12556994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
