119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1445107)
1. An evaluation of the effect of processing conditions on mammographic film contrast, fog levels and speed.
McLean D
Australas Radiol; 1992 Aug; 36(3):234-7. PubMed ID: 1445107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sensitometric evaluation of some mammographic film-screen combinations.
McLean D
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1991 Sep; 14(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 1953502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of processing conditions on mammographic image quality.
Braeuning MP; Cooper HW; O'Brien S; Burns CB; Washburn DB; Schell MJ; Pisano ED
Acad Radiol; 1999 Aug; 6(8):464-70. PubMed ID: 10480042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of a new F speed dental X-ray film. The effect of processing solutions and a comparison with D and E speed films.
Farman TT; Farman AG
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jan; 29(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 10654035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Phantom evaluation of the effect of film processing on mammographic screen-film combinations.
McLean D; Rickard MT
Australas Radiol; 1994 Aug; 38(3):179-82. PubMed ID: 7945109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Optimizing techniques in screen-film mammography.
Hendrick RE; Berns EA
Radiol Clin North Am; 2000 Jul; 38(4):701-18, viii. PubMed ID: 10943272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Recent advances in screen-film mammography.
Haus AG
Radiol Clin North Am; 1987 Sep; 25(5):913-28. PubMed ID: 3306773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mammographic film-processor temperature, development time, and chemistry: effect on dose, contrast, and noise.
Kimme-Smith C; Rothschild PA; Bassett LW; Gold RH; Moler C
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1989 Jan; 152(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 2783288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The influence of film processing temperature and time on mammographic image quality.
Brink C; de Villiers JF; Lötter MG; van Zyl M
Br J Radiol; 1993 Aug; 66(788):685-90. PubMed ID: 7719681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative evaluation of the sensitometric properties of screen-film systems and conventional dental receptors for intraoral radiography.
Kircos LT; Staninec M; Chou L
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1989 Dec; 68(6):787-92. PubMed ID: 2594331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Variation of the sensitometric characteristics of seven mammographic films with processing conditions.
Tsalafoutas IA; Dimakopoulou AD; Koulentianos ED; Serefoglou AN; Yakoumakis EN
Br J Radiol; 2004 Aug; 77(920):666-71. PubMed ID: 15326045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mammography screen-film selection: individual facility testing technique.
Kimme-Smith C; Bassett L; Gold RH; Parkinson B
Med Phys; 1992; 19(5):1195-9. PubMed ID: 1435598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mammographic dual-screen-dual-emulsion-film combination: visibility of simulated microcalcifications and effect on image contrast.
Kimme-Smith C; Bassett LW; Gold RH; Roe D; Orr J
Radiology; 1987 Nov; 165(2):313-8. PubMed ID: 3310091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sensitometric comparison of speed group E and F dental radiographic films.
Geist JR; Brand JW
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 May; 30(3):147-52. PubMed ID: 11420626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of varying processing solution temperature on radiographic contrast and relative film speed of dental film.
Matthee MJ; Becker PJ; Seeliger JE
J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1990 Dec; 45(12):525-8. PubMed ID: 2098942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of a new mammographic film: methods and considerations.
Tsalafoutas OA; Kolovos CA; Tsapaki V; Betsou S; Koliakou E; Maniatis PN; Xenofos S
Health Phys; 2008 Apr; 94(4):338-44. PubMed ID: 18332725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Optimum processing of mammographic film.
Sprawls P; Kitts EL
Radiographics; 1996 Mar; 16(2):349-54. PubMed ID: 8966292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Performance tests for mammographic film-screen combinations: use of absolute techniques.
Bor D; Akdur K
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2013; 19(5):360-70. PubMed ID: 23603122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Image quality and breast dose of 24 screen-film combinations for mammography.
Dimakopoulou AD; Tsalafoutas IA; Georgiou EK; Yakoumakis EN
Br J Radiol; 2006 Feb; 79(938):123-9. PubMed ID: 16489193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [-Overexposed film--underexposed film-].
Patrux C
Ann Radiol (Paris); 1997; 40(2):137-46. PubMed ID: 9754345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
