These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14457501)

  • 1. [A contribution to expert testimony of Rh exceptions in paternity blood group studies].
    KOBIELA J; SOCHA W
    Dtsch Z Gesamte Gerichtl Med; 1961; 51():624-6. PubMed ID: 14457501
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [A contribution to the problem of evaluation of the probability of paternity in blood group serological paternity expert testimony].
    STUTZ HR; ZIMMERMANN W
    Z Immun exp ther; 1960 May; 11():479-87. PubMed ID: 13835485
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Comparison of calculated probability of paternity on the basis of blood group characteristics with opinion of expert testimony on biological heredity in 165 cases].
    PROKOP O; SCHNEIDER W
    Dtsch Z Gesamte Gerichtl Med; 1958; 47(3):484-501. PubMed ID: 13597642
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [The blood group systen Gm-a Gm-b in paternity expert testimony: probability values based on the Essen-Moeller formula].
    WICHMANN D
    Blut; 1962 May; 8():167-8. PubMed ID: 14006701
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [New conclusions drawn from blood examination in expert testimony 1945-1948].
    MAYSER H
    Dtsch Z Gesamte Gerichtl Med; 1951; 40(4):326-34. PubMed ID: 24541469
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [INCIDENCE DISTRIBUTION AND MOTHER/CHILD COMBINATION IN THE HP-, GM- AND GC SERUM GROUPS FROM HAMBURG MATERIAL AND ITS USE IN BLOOD GROUP EXPERT TESTIMONY].
    HENNIG W; HOPPE HH
    Blut; 1964; 10():361-7. PubMed ID: 14281006
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [The practical significance of the Essen-Moeller method and the "Rh combination calculation" for serological paternity expert testimony with use of the ABO, MN, Rh, Kell and P systems. III. The efficacy of the method in cases with two or more men, empirically determined].
    HUMMEL K; SCHMIDTKE I
    Z Immun exp ther; 1959 Aug; 118():108-20. PubMed ID: 14405353
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Blood group expert testimony: anthropologico-heredobiological expert testimony. Proof value in forensic paternity lawsuits].
    Dahr P
    Med Welt; 1968 Nov; 48():2674-5. PubMed ID: 5730616
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Gm frequency and value of the Gm system in paternity expert testimony].
    GOHLER W; DURWALD W; HUNGER H
    Dtsch Z Gesamte Gerichtl Med; 1963; 53():122-30. PubMed ID: 13963314
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [The opinion in paternity expert testimony in a post-conception gestation period of less than 181 days].
    MUELLER D; von ARCO-ZINNEBERG
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1962 Jan; 84():68-75. PubMed ID: 13936476
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Conclusions in expert testimony on disputed paternity].
    Potapov MI; Barsegiants LO; Sakharov RS; Kuprina TA
    Sud Med Ekspert; 1986; 29(1):34-6. PubMed ID: 3961859
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Blood group expert testimony in calculating the probabilities in disputed paternity].
    Spielmann W; Renninger W
    Z Rechtsmed; 1970; 67(4):201-10. PubMed ID: 5477590
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Use and value of Rh determination in blood-group paternity tests].
    KRAH E
    Z Hyg Infektionskr; 1951; 133(3):193-210. PubMed ID: 14922936
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Problems and pitfalls in blood grouping tests for non-parentage. IV. Qualifications of experts.
    Wiener AS
    J Forensic Sci; 1972 Oct; 17(4):555-60. PubMed ID: 4218864
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Paternity case--direct and cross-examination of plaintiff's expert immunohematologist.
    Med Trial Tech Q; 1982; 28(3):335-60. PubMed ID: 6927804
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [The value of serological expert testimony from the legal viewpoint].
    Koffka E
    Beitr Gerichtl Med; 1969; 25():97-104. PubMed ID: 5821402
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [The empirical determination of the probability of paternity].
    Homma H
    Beitr Gerichtl Med; 1969; 26():159-74. PubMed ID: 5366488
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Positive paternity determination with the Essen-Möller seologic biostatic method].
    Gross H; Gross HG
    Med Welt; 1969 Aug; 33():1776-8. PubMed ID: 5357976
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Importance of Kühne's spinal method for paternity exclusion; expert opinion].
    STERN C
    Acta Genet Stat Med; 1956; 6(1 Part 2):92-102. PubMed ID: 13354245
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [The blood group specialist and the proposed new illegitimacy law].
    Hummel K
    Dtsch Z Gesamte Gerichtl Med; 1968; 64(2):115-23. PubMed ID: 4974840
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.